Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/unit tests #81

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Jul 22, 2022
Merged

Feature/unit tests #81

merged 25 commits into from
Jul 22, 2022

Conversation

sdat2
Copy link
Member

@sdat2 sdat2 commented Jul 14, 2022

Hi,

I am adding a some unit tests that will run as a github action for a few different versions of python at each push.

Currently it only pip installs the package and creates the test data, but I will add a few more.

I've added settings in the pytest.ini file that allow code blocks using >>> in python docstrings to act both as unit tests and examples, which should hopefully reduce duplication.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 14, 2022

python-3.10 not able to install rasterio as detailed in #71 .

@sdat2 sdat2 requested a review from herbiebradley July 14, 2022 12:20
@herbiebradley
Copy link
Member

herbiebradley commented Jul 15, 2022

Feel free to unpin rasterio from the requirements, then run the GitHub actions again! I tested with Python 3.10 and then just pip installed the requirements.txt as normal with the latest version of rasterio and everything seems to work.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 16, 2022

Hi Herbie, That makes sense, I'll try unpinning the rasterio version.

RE using the requirements.txt file, I guess that that isn't an ideal thing to do if we want to make sure our pip package is compatible? Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you pip install geograph from somewhere else, that wouldn't be used? If that's right, that would undermine people's ability to easily build their packages on top of ours.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 16, 2022

Ah ok, so everything seems to be ok now for linux/mac, but I should probably fix windows as well for completeness.

@herbiebradley
Copy link
Member

Hi Herbie, That makes sense, I'll try unpinning the rasterio version.

RE using the requirements.txt file, I guess that that isn't an ideal thing to do if we want to make sure our pip package is compatible? Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you pip install geograph from somewhere else, that wouldn't be used? If that's right, that would undermine people's ability to easily build their packages on top of ours.

Yes, I just meant that for dev purposes I use the requirements.txt. Of course the actual place to unpin is setup.py, as you have done. :)

@herbiebradley
Copy link
Member

Regarding the GDAL Windows issue, you may be able to fix this by including a GDAL wheels download and install in the configuration somehow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55583234/installation-fails-for-fiona-and-geopandas-with-gdal-on-python-3-6-on-microsoft

But it's not a big deal for now if it doesn't work - interestingly this was so annoying for geopandas that they don't try to solve it for the user and instead suggest Windows users use pyogrio which is a fiona alternative.

- name: Lint with flake8
run: |
# stop the build if there are Python syntax errors or undefined names
flake8 . --count --select=E9,F63,F7,F82 --show-source --statistics
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do these error codes mean?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, I'm not sure, I originally adapted this from a github actions example. Given that we have pylint anyway, I will get rid of this section.

Copy link
Member

@herbiebradley herbiebradley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I was wondering what is the reason for adding pipwin and descartes to setup.py? You could also add matplotlib and seaborn since I noticed some of our code requires them and I couldn't figure out why we didn't include them, unless you can remember?

@herbiebradley herbiebradley marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2022 15:30
@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 21, 2022

Hi, sure, I'm very happy to give up on Windows. I guess we can direct any windows users to this stack exchange answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/65082853 if they want to use this package.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 21, 2022

Hi Herbie, I only added 'pipwin' and 'descartes' to the setup.py to try to fix the GDAL error based on some stack exchange answers. I will remove them again in the next commit.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 21, 2022

(The CI github action was still triggered by master rather than main)

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 21, 2022

I've added only one unit test, which is more of a "smoke test". It might be worth adding some more before we merge this branch in.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 21, 2022

Ah ok, the CI pylint test is broken, do you think that would be worth fixing?

Copy link
Member

@herbiebradley herbiebradley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I don't think it's necessary to fix the pylint errors for this PR, I can either fix them or turn off the unnecessary error codes later.

@sdat2
Copy link
Member Author

sdat2 commented Jul 22, 2022

Sure, I can merge and then add some more unit tests in a future pull request.

@sdat2 sdat2 merged commit 27b5ee7 into main Jul 22, 2022
@sdat2 sdat2 deleted the feature/unit-tests branch July 22, 2022 08:47
@sdat2 sdat2 restored the feature/unit-tests branch July 22, 2022 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants