You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How do we want to handle things like this?
Technical debt is a well known concept to some and has been wildly discussed - on the other hand it is also subject to a huge amount of semantic diffusion so it might be appropriate to have a section on the concept itself.
So here are the resulting questions:
a) (concrete) Do we want to have our own description of the concept technical debt?
b) (meta) If we would like to have such a description - where would we put it (and others like it)
c) (concrete) IF a.false() { which article(s) to link to? And where to put the links? }
Can't agree more :) I also noticed that this is not there yet but I consider it one of the most important metaphors. I would even expand the question whether it makes sense to introduce the metaphor thoroughly and use the terminology throughout the document. So I tend to prefer a).
Actually the question is not really, what technical debt is ;-)
I reference the concept in Introduce Boy Scout Rule, Gernot references it in the introduction and long term goal.
How do we want to handle things like this?
Technical debt is a well known concept to some and has been wildly discussed - on the other hand it is also subject to a huge amount of semantic diffusion so it might be appropriate to have a section on the concept itself.
So here are the resulting questions:
a) (concrete) Do we want to have our own description of the concept technical debt?
b) (meta) If we would like to have such a description - where would we put it (and others like it)
c) (concrete) IF a.false() { which article(s) to link to? And where to put the links? }
Suggestions for c)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: