Update fivetran-vs-airbyte.md

docs/faq/differences-with/fivetran-vs-airbyte.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ We wrote an article, “[Open-source vs. Commercial Software: How to Solve the D
 
 ## **Airbyte:**
 
-* **Free, as open source, so no more pricing based on usage**: learn more about our [future business model](../../company-handbook/business-model.md) \(connectors will always remain open source\). 
+* **Free, as open source, so no more pricing based on usage**: learn more about our [future business model](https://handbook.airbyte.io/strategy/business-model) \(connectors will always remain open source\). 
 * **Supporting 60 connectors within 8 months from inception**.  Our goal is to reach 200+ connectors by the end of 2021. 
 * **Building new connectors made trivial, in the language of your choice:** Airbyte makes it a lot easier to create your own connector, vs. building them yourself in-house \(with Airflow or other tools\). Scheduling, orchestration, and monitoring comes out of the box with Airbyte.
 * **Addressing the long tail of connectors:** with the help of the community, Airbyte ambitions to support thousands of connectors.