Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Toph increases rate limit for shared issues #17265

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

supertopher
Copy link
Contributor

Sooo many sad people have hit this rate limit. there is actually alot of underlying issues.

this PR is a bandaid for rate limits AND a clarification on what is running

also renames the file to be more clear to outsiders
took me some time to find, saving others
@supertopher supertopher force-pushed the toph_increases_rate_limit_for_shared_issues branch from c555de0 to 25dbefb Compare September 27, 2022 17:30
@supertopher supertopher temporarily deployed to more-secrets September 27, 2022 17:32 Inactive
run: |
./tools/bin/find_non_rate_limited_PAT \
${{ secrets.OCTAVIA_PAT }} \
${{ secrets.OCTAVIA_4_ROOT_ACCESS }}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a new Octavia user with new PAT limits

@supertopher supertopher requested review from bleonard, lmossman and a team September 27, 2022 17:51
Copy link
Contributor

@lmossman lmossman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have much context on the find_non_rate_limited_PAT stuff so I think I'll leave it to someone else on your team to approve, but it seems like this will help! Thanks for putting this up!

Copy link
Contributor

@git-phu git-phu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!
I like the renamed file and extra comments too!

steps:
- uses: nick-fields/private-action-loader@v3
with:
pal-repo-token: "${{ secrets.OCTAVIA_PAT }}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use the find_valid_pat output token for this as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ty pete. missed it

@supertopher supertopher temporarily deployed to more-secrets September 27, 2022 18:37 Inactive
@supertopher supertopher merged commit 9379a9b into master Sep 27, 2022
@supertopher supertopher deleted the toph_increases_rate_limit_for_shared_issues branch September 27, 2022 18:58
@bleonard
Copy link
Contributor

bleonard commented Sep 28, 2022

Looks like this is failing. https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3139838149/jobs/5100623564

Cloning into './.private-action'...
fatal: could not read Password for 'https://***@github.com': No such device or address
Error: Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

@supertopher
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm pretty sure I checked the wrong pipeline to verify this worked 🤦

working on a fix now

robbinhan pushed a commit to robbinhan/airbyte that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
* Adds second PAT for issue labeller

also renames the file to be more clear to outsiders

* Adds reference to code that runs

took me some time to find, saving others

* comment cleanup

* use find_valid_pat output for both actions
jhammarstedt pushed a commit to jhammarstedt/airbyte that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2022
* Adds second PAT for issue labeller

also renames the file to be more clear to outsiders

* Adds reference to code that runs

took me some time to find, saving others

* comment cleanup

* use find_valid_pat output for both actions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants