New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Destination typesense: Update check() to mitigate "check() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given" #34336
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Ignored Deployment
|
Before Merging a Connector Pull RequestWow! What a great pull request you have here! 🎉 To merge this PR, ensure the following has been done/considered for each connector added or updated:
If the checklist is complete, but the CI check is failing,
|
Hello @jenssogaard can you sign the CLA or make sure the contribution was made by the same user? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @jenssogaard
Awesome. Happy to contribute. |
…positional arguments but 3 were given" (airbytehq#34336) Co-authored-by: Marcos Marx <marcosmarxm@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: marcosmarxm <marcosmarxm@gmail.com>
…positional arguments but 3 were given" (airbytehq#34336) Co-authored-by: Marcos Marx <marcosmarxm@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: marcosmarxm <marcosmarxm@gmail.com>
…positional arguments but 3 were given" (airbytehq#34336) Co-authored-by: Marcos Marx <marcosmarxm@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: marcosmarxm <marcosmarxm@gmail.com>
What
When adding typesense as a destination
check()
fails due to incorrect number of arguments #34331.How
Support
logger
as 2nd argument incheck()
as all other destinations.🚨 User Impact 🚨
Minor version bump. Should resolve #34331
Updating a connector
Community member or Airbyter