Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🐛 Source File Secure: add secret name for publish config #7221

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2021
Merged

🐛 Source File Secure: add secret name for publish config #7221

merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2021

Conversation

antixar
Copy link
Contributor

@antixar antixar commented Oct 20, 2021

What

##[endgroup***
##[debug***/usr/bin/bash -e /actions-runner/_work/_temp/96a960e6-9513-475f-bf5b-0c71f547bbc8.sh
Creds not set for source-file-secure
##[error***Process completed with exit code 1.
##[debug***Finishing: Write Integration Test Credentials

How

need to add the secret key to .github/workflows/publish-command.yml

@antixar antixar temporarily deployed to more-secrets October 20, 2021 16:51 Inactive
marcosmarxm
marcosmarxm approved these changes Oct 20, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@marcosmarxm marcosmarxm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@antixar antixar merged commit bc78e1c into master Oct 20, 2021
@antixar antixar deleted the antixar/source-file-secure-public-secret branch October 20, 2021 17:03
@jrhizor jrhizor mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2021
Merged
schlattk pushed a commit to schlattk/airbyte that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
@antixar @schlattk
add secret name for publish config (airbytehq#7221)
6e8d4f3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@marcosmarxm marcosmarxm marcosmarxm approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@antixar @marcosmarxm