Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark result versioning #509

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 24, 2017
Merged

Conversation

pv
Copy link
Collaborator

@pv pv commented Apr 15, 2017

Add a version attribute to benchmarks, and when benchmarks are run,
tag the results produced with it. The default value is based on hash of
source code lines, but can be overridden by user.

In run, consider results with different benchmark version as missing.
In compare, mark incompatible results.
In publish, ignore results with different benchmark versions.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 73.457% when pulling 53b45ca on pv:bench-versioning into a95b68d on spacetelescope:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 73.469% when pulling 53b45ca on pv:bench-versioning into a95b68d on spacetelescope:master.

pv added 6 commits May 4, 2017 22:42
Add a version attribute to benchmarks, and when benchmarks are run,
tag the results produced with it. The default value is based on hash of
source code lines, but can be overridden by user.

In run, consider results with different benchmark version as missing.
In compare, mark incompatible results.
In publish, ignore results with different benchmark versions.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 73.454% when pulling ba4edbb on pv:bench-versioning into 953c960 on spacetelescope:master.

@pv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pv commented Jun 22, 2017

Seems to work ok in dogfooding, so planning to merge.

@pv pv merged commit 7cbf113 into airspeed-velocity:master Jun 24, 2017
@pv pv deleted the bench-versioning branch August 19, 2018 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants