forked from dmitryvk/sbcl-win32-threads
/
clos.impure.lisp
1942 lines (1744 loc) · 76.6 KB
/
clos.impure.lisp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
;;;; miscellaneous side-effectful tests of CLOS
;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
;;;; more information.
;;;;
;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
;;;; from CMU CL.
;;;;
;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
(load "compiler-test-util.lisp")
(defpackage "CLOS-IMPURE"
(:use "CL" "ASSERTOID" "TEST-UTIL" "COMPILER-TEST-UTIL"))
(in-package "CLOS-IMPURE")
;;; It should be possible to do DEFGENERIC and DEFMETHOD referring to
;;; structure types defined earlier in the file.
(defstruct struct-a x y)
(defstruct struct-b x y z)
(defmethod wiggle ((a struct-a))
(+ (struct-a-x a)
(struct-a-y a)))
(defgeneric jiggle (arg))
(defmethod jiggle ((a struct-a))
(- (struct-a-x a)
(struct-a-y a)))
(defmethod jiggle ((b struct-b))
(- (struct-b-x b)
(struct-b-y b)
(struct-b-z b)))
(assert (= (wiggle (make-struct-a :x 6 :y 5))
(jiggle (make-struct-b :x 19 :y 6 :z 2))))
;;; Compiling DEFGENERIC should prevent "undefined function" style
;;; warnings from code within the same file.
(defgeneric gf-defined-in-this-file (x y))
(defun function-using-gf-defined-in-this-file (x y n)
(unless (minusp n)
(gf-defined-in-this-file x y)))
;;; Until Martin Atzmueller ported Pierre Mai's CMU CL fixes in
;;; sbcl-0.6.12.25, the implementation of NO-APPLICABLE-METHOD was
;;; broken in such a way that the code here would signal an error.
(defgeneric zut-n-a-m (a b c))
(defmethod no-applicable-method ((zut-n-a-m (eql #'zut-n-a-m)) &rest args)
(format t "~&No applicable method for ZUT-N-A-M ~S, yet.~%" args))
(zut-n-a-m 1 2 3)
;;; bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-09-10:
;;; This DEFGENERIC shouldn't cause an error.
(defgeneric ad-gf (a) (:method :around (x) x))
;;; DEFGENERIC and DEFMETHOD shouldn't accept &REST when it's not
;;; followed by a variable:
;;; e.g. (DEFMETHOD FOO ((X T) &REST) NIL) should signal an error.
(eval-when (:load-toplevel :compile-toplevel :execute)
(defmacro expect-error (&body body)
`(multiple-value-bind (res condition)
(ignore-errors (progn ,@body))
(declare (ignore res))
(typep condition 'error))))
(assert (expect-error (defmethod foo0 ((x t) &rest) nil)))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo1 (x &rest))))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo2 (x a &rest))))
(defgeneric foo3 (x &rest y))
(defmethod foo3 ((x t) &rest y) nil)
(defmethod foo4 ((x t) &rest z &key y) nil)
(defgeneric foo4 (x &rest z &key y))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo5 (x &rest))))
(assert (expect-error (defmethod foo6 (x &rest))))
;;; legal method specializers
(defclass bug-525916-1 () ())
(defclass bug-525916-2 () ())
(with-test (:name :bug-525916)
(assert (expect-error (defmethod invalid ((arg)) arg)))
(assert (expect-error (defmethod invalid (nil) 1)))
(assert (expect-error (defmethod invalid ((arg . bug-525916-1)) arg)))
(assert (expect-error (defmethod invalid ((arg bug-525916-1 bug-525916-2)) arg))))
;;; more lambda-list checking
;;;
;;; DEFGENERIC lambda lists are subject to various limitations, as per
;;; section 3.4.2 of the ANSI spec. Since Alexey Dejneka's patch for
;;; bug 191-b ca. sbcl-0.7.22, these limitations should be enforced.
(labels ((coerce-to-boolean (x)
(if x t nil))
(%like-or-dislike (expr expected-failure-p)
(declare (type boolean expected-failure-p))
(format t "~&trying ~S~%" expr)
(multiple-value-bind (fun warnings-p failure-p)
(compile nil
`(lambda ()
,expr))
(declare (ignore fun))
;; In principle the constraint on WARNINGS-P below seems
;; reasonable, but in practice we get warnings about
;; undefined functions from the DEFGENERICs, apparently
;; because the DECLAIMs which ordinarily prevent such
;; warnings don't take effect because EVAL-WHEN
;; (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) loses its magic when compiled
;; within a LAMBDA. So maybe we can't test WARNINGS-P
;; after all?
;;(unless expected-failure-p
;; (assert (not warnings-p)))
(assert (eq (coerce-to-boolean failure-p) expected-failure-p))))
(like (expr)
(%like-or-dislike expr nil))
(dislike (expr)
(%like-or-dislike expr t)))
;; basic sanity
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-0 ("a" #p"b")))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-1 ()))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-2 (x)))
;; forbidden default or supplied-p for &OPTIONAL or &KEY arguments
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-3 (x &optional (y 0))))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-4 (x &optional y)))
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-5 (x y &key (z :z z-p))))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-6 (x y &key z)))
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-7 (x &optional (y 0) &key z)))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-8 (x &optional y &key z)))
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-9 (x &optional y &key (z :z))))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-10 (x &optional y &key z)))
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-11 (&optional &key (k :k k-p))))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-12 (&optional &key k)))
;; forbidden &AUX
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-13 (x y z &optional a &aux g h)))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-14 (x y z &optional a)))
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-bare-aux-1 (x &aux)))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-bare-aux-2 (x)))
;; also can't use bogoDEFMETHODish type-qualifier-ish decorations
;; on required arguments
(dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-11-test-15 ((arg t))))
(like '(defgeneric gf-for-11-test-16 (arg))))
;;; structure-class tests setup
(defclass structure-class-foo1 () () (:metaclass cl:structure-class))
(defclass structure-class-foo2 (structure-class-foo1)
() (:metaclass cl:structure-class))
;;; standard-class tests setup
(defclass standard-class-foo1 () () (:metaclass cl:standard-class))
(defclass standard-class-foo2 (standard-class-foo1)
() (:metaclass cl:standard-class))
(assert (typep (class-of (make-instance 'structure-class-foo1))
'structure-class))
(assert (typep (make-instance 'structure-class-foo1) 'structure-class-foo1))
(assert (typep (make-instance 'standard-class-foo1) 'standard-class-foo1))
;;; DEFGENERIC's blow-away-old-methods behavior is specified to have
;;; special hacks to distinguish between defined-with-DEFGENERIC-:METHOD
;;; methods and defined-with-DEFMETHOD methods, so that reLOADing
;;; DEFGENERIC-containing files does the right thing instead of
;;; randomly slicing your generic functions. (APD made this work
;;; in sbcl-0.7.0.2.)
(defgeneric born-to-be-redefined (x)
(:method ((x integer))
'integer))
(defmethod born-to-be-redefined ((x real))
'real)
(assert (eq (born-to-be-redefined 1) 'integer))
(defgeneric born-to-be-redefined (x))
(assert (eq (born-to-be-redefined 1) 'real)) ; failed until sbcl-0.7.0.2
(defgeneric born-to-be-redefined (x)
(:method ((x integer))
'integer))
(defmethod born-to-be-redefined ((x integer))
'int)
(assert (eq (born-to-be-redefined 1) 'int))
(defgeneric born-to-be-redefined (x))
(assert (eq (born-to-be-redefined 1) 'int))
;;; In the removal of ITERATE from SB-PCL, a bug was introduced
;;; preventing forward-references and also change-class (which
;;; forward-references used interally) from working properly. One
;;; symptom was reported by Brian Spilsbury (sbcl-devel 2002-04-08),
;;; and another on IRC by Dan Barlow simultaneously. Better check
;;; that it doesn't happen again.
;;;
;;; First, the forward references:
(defclass forward-ref-a (forward-ref-b) ())
(defclass forward-ref-b () ())
;;; (a couple more complicated examples found by Paul Dietz' test
;;; suite):
(defclass forward-ref-c1 (forward-ref-c2) ())
(defclass forward-ref-c2 (forward-ref-c3) ())
(defclass forward-ref-d1 (forward-ref-d2 forward-ref-d3) ())
(defclass forward-ref-d2 (forward-ref-d4 forward-ref-d5) ())
;;; Then change-class
(defclass class-with-slots ()
((a-slot :initarg :a-slot :accessor a-slot)
(b-slot :initarg :b-slot :accessor b-slot)
(c-slot :initarg :c-slot :accessor c-slot)))
(let ((foo (make-instance 'class-with-slots
:a-slot 1
:b-slot 2
:c-slot 3)))
(let ((bar (change-class foo 'class-with-slots)))
(assert (= (a-slot bar) 1))
(assert (= (b-slot bar) 2))
(assert (= (c-slot bar) 3))))
;;; some more CHANGE-CLASS testing, now that we have an ANSI-compliant
;;; version (thanks to Espen Johnsen)
(defclass from-class ()
((foo :initarg :foo :accessor foo)))
(defclass to-class ()
((foo :initarg :foo :accessor foo)
(bar :initarg :bar :accessor bar)))
(let* ((from (make-instance 'from-class :foo 1))
(to (change-class from 'to-class :bar 2)))
(assert (= (foo to) 1))
(assert (= (bar to) 2)))
;;; Until Pierre Mai's patch (sbcl-devel 2002-06-18, merged in
;;; sbcl-0.7.4.39) the :MOST-SPECIFIC-LAST option had no effect.
(defgeneric bug180 (x)
(:method-combination list :most-specific-last))
(defmethod bug180 list ((x number))
'number)
(defmethod bug180 list ((x fixnum))
'fixnum)
(assert (equal (bug180 14) '(number fixnum)))
;;; printing a structure class should not loop indefinitely (or cause
;;; a stack overflow):
(defclass test-printing-structure-class ()
((slot :initarg :slot))
(:metaclass structure-class))
(print (make-instance 'test-printing-structure-class :slot 2))
;;; structure-classes should behave nicely when subclassed
(defclass super-structure ()
((a :initarg :a :accessor a-accessor)
(b :initform 2 :reader b-reader))
(:metaclass structure-class))
(defclass sub-structure (super-structure)
((c :initarg :c :writer c-writer :accessor c-accessor))
(:metaclass structure-class))
(let ((foo (make-instance 'sub-structure :a 1 :c 3)))
(assert (= (a-accessor foo) 1))
(assert (= (b-reader foo) 2))
(assert (= (c-accessor foo) 3))
(setf (a-accessor foo) 4)
(c-writer 5 foo)
(assert (= (a-accessor foo) 4))
(assert (= (c-accessor foo) 5)))
;;; At least as of sbcl-0.7.4, PCL has code to support a special
;;; encoding of effective method functions for slot accessors as
;;; FIXNUMs. Given this special casing, it'd be easy for slot accessor
;;; functions to get broken in special ways even though ordinary
;;; generic functions work. As of sbcl-0.7.4 we didn't have any tests
;;; for that possibility. Now we have a few tests:
(defclass fish ()
((fin :reader ffin :writer ffin!)
(tail :reader ftail :writer ftail!)))
(defvar *fish* (make-instance 'fish))
(ffin! 'triangular-fin *fish*)
(defclass cod (fish) ())
(defvar *cod* (make-instance 'cod))
(defparameter *clos-dispatch-side-fx* (make-array 0 :fill-pointer 0))
(defmethod ffin! (new-fin (cod cod))
(format t "~&about to set ~S fin to ~S~%" cod new-fin)
(vector-push-extend '(cod) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*)
(prog1
(call-next-method)
(format t "~&done setting ~S fin to ~S~%" cod new-fin)))
(defmethod ffin! :before (new-fin (cod cod))
(vector-push-extend '(:before cod) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*)
(format t "~&exploring the CLOS dispatch zoo with COD fins~%"))
(ffin! 'almost-triang-fin *cod*)
(assert (eq (ffin *cod*) 'almost-triang-fin))
(assert (equalp #((:before cod) (cod)) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*))
;;; Until sbcl-0.7.6.21, the long form of DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION
;;; ignored its options; Gerd Moellmann found and fixed the problem
;;; for cmucl (cmucl-imp 2002-06-18).
(define-method-combination test-mc (x)
;; X above being a method-group-specifier
((primary () :required t))
`(call-method ,(first primary)))
(defgeneric gf (obj)
(:method-combination test-mc 1))
(defmethod gf (obj)
obj)
;;; Until sbcl-0.7.7.20, some conditions weren't being signalled, and
;;; some others were of the wrong type:
(macrolet ((assert-program-error (form)
`(multiple-value-bind (value error)
(ignore-errors ,form)
(unless (and (null value) (typep error 'program-error))
(error "~S failed: ~S, ~S" ',form value error)))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo001 () (a b a)))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo002 ()
(a b)
(:default-initargs x 'a x 'b)))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo003 ()
((a :allocation :class :allocation :class))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo004 ()
((a :silly t))))
;; and some more, found by Wolfhard Buss and fixed for cmucl by Gerd
;; Moellmann in sbcl-0.7.8.x:
(assert-program-error (progn
(defmethod odd-key-args-checking (&key (key 42)) key)
(odd-key-args-checking 3)))
(assert (= (odd-key-args-checking) 42))
(assert (eq (odd-key-args-checking :key t) t))
;; yet some more, fixed in sbcl-0.7.9.xx
(assert-program-error (defclass foo005 ()
(:metaclass sb-pcl::funcallable-standard-class)
(:metaclass 1)))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo006 ()
((a :reader (setf a)))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo007 ()
((a :initarg 1))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo008 ()
(a :initarg :a)
(:default-initargs :a 1)
(:default-initargs :a 2)))
;; and also BUG 47d, fixed in sbcl-0.8alpha.0.26
(assert-program-error (defgeneric if (x)))
;; DEFCLASS should detect an error if slot names aren't suitable as
;; variable names:
(assert-program-error (defclass foo009 ()
((:a :initarg :a))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo010 ()
(("a" :initarg :a))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo011 ()
((#1a() :initarg :a))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo012 ()
((t :initarg :t))))
(assert-program-error (defclass foo013 () ("a")))
;; specialized lambda lists have certain restrictions on ordering,
;; repeating keywords, and the like:
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo014 ((foo t) &rest) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo015 ((foo t) &rest x y) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo016 ((foo t) &allow-other-keys) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo017 ((foo t)
&optional x &optional y) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo018 ((foo t) &rest x &rest y) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo019 ((foo t) &rest x &optional y) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo020 ((foo t) &key x &optional y) nil))
(assert-program-error (defmethod foo021 ((foo t) &key x &rest y) nil)))
;;; DOCUMENTATION's argument-precedence-order wasn't being faithfully
;;; preserved through the bootstrap process until sbcl-0.7.8.39.
;;; (thanks to Gerd Moellmann)
(with-test (:name :documentation-argument-precedence-order)
(defun foo022 ()
"Documentation"
t)
(let ((answer (documentation 'foo022 'function)))
(assert (stringp answer))
(defmethod documentation ((x (eql 'foo022)) y) "WRONG")
(assert (string= (documentation 'foo022 'function) answer))))
;;; only certain declarations are permitted in DEFGENERIC
(macrolet ((assert-program-error (form)
`(multiple-value-bind (value error)
(ignore-errors ,form)
(assert (null value))
(assert (typep error 'program-error)))))
(assert-program-error (defgeneric bogus-declaration (x)
(declare (special y))))
(assert-program-error (defgeneric bogus-declaration2 (x)
(declare (notinline concatenate)))))
;;; CALL-NEXT-METHOD should call NO-NEXT-METHOD if there is no next
;;; method.
(defmethod no-next-method-test ((x integer)) (call-next-method))
(assert (null (ignore-errors (no-next-method-test 1))))
(defmethod no-next-method ((g (eql #'no-next-method-test)) m &rest args)
'success)
(assert (eq (no-next-method-test 1) 'success))
(assert (null (ignore-errors (no-next-method-test 'foo))))
;;; regression test for bug 176, following a fix that seems
;;; simultaneously to fix 140 while not exposing 176 (by Gerd
;;; Moellmann, merged in sbcl-0.7.9.12).
(dotimes (i 10)
(let ((lastname (intern (format nil "C176-~D" (1- i))))
(name (intern (format nil "C176-~D" i))))
(eval `(defclass ,name
(,@(if (= i 0) nil (list lastname)))
()))
(eval `(defmethod initialize-instance :after ((x ,name) &rest any)
(declare (ignore any))))))
(defclass b176 () (aslot-176))
(defclass c176-0 (b176) ())
(assert (= 1 (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'c176-9) 'aslot-176) 1)))
;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION was over-eager at checking for duplicate
;;; primary methods:
(define-method-combination dmc-test-mc (&optional (order :most-specific-first))
((around (:around))
(primary (dmc-test-mc) :order order :required t))
(let ((form (if (rest primary)
`(and ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method)
`(call-method ,method))
primary))
`(call-method ,(first primary)))))
(if around
`(call-method ,(first around)
(,@(rest around)
(make-method ,form)))
form)))
(defgeneric dmc-test-mc (&key k)
(:method-combination dmc-test-mc))
(defmethod dmc-test-mc dmc-test-mc (&key k)
k)
(dmc-test-mc :k 1)
;;; While I'm at it, DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION is defined to return
;;; the NAME argument, not some random method object. So:
(assert (eq (define-method-combination dmc-test-return-foo)
'dmc-test-return-foo))
(assert (eq (define-method-combination dmc-test-return-bar :operator and)
'dmc-test-return-bar))
(assert (eq (define-method-combination dmc-test-return
(&optional (order :most-specific-first))
((around (:around))
(primary (dmc-test-return) :order order :required t))
(let ((form (if (rest primary)
`(and ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method)
`(call-method ,method))
primary))
`(call-method ,(first primary)))))
(if around
`(call-method ,(first around)
(,@(rest around)
(make-method ,form)))
form)))
'dmc-test-return))
;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION should, according to the description in 7.7,
;;; allow you to do everything in the body forms yourself if you specify
;;; exactly one method group whose qualifier-pattern is *
;;;
;;; The specific language is:
;;; "The use of method group specifiers provides a convenient syntax to select
;;; methods, to divide them among the possible roles, and to perform the
;;; necessary error checking. It is possible to perform further filtering of
;;; methods in the body forms by using normal list-processing operations and
;;; the functions method-qualifiers and invalid-method-error. It is permissible
;;; to use setq on the variables named in the method group specifiers and to
;;; bind additional variables. It is also possible to bypass the method group
;;; specifier mechanism and do everything in the body forms. This is
;;; accomplished by writing a single method group with * as its only
;;; qualifier-pattern; the variable is then bound to a list of all of the
;;; applicable methods, in most-specific-first order."
(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-a ()
((all-methods *))
(do ((methods all-methods (rest methods))
(primary nil)
(around nil))
((null methods)
(let ((primary (nreverse primary))
(around (nreverse around)))
(if primary
(let ((form (if (rest primary)
`(call-method ,(first primary) ,(rest primary))
`(call-method ,(first primary)))))
(if around
`(call-method ,(first around) (,@(rest around)
(make-method ,form)))
form))
`(make-method (error "No primary methods")))))
(let* ((method (first methods))
(qualifier (first (method-qualifiers method))))
(cond
((equal :around qualifier)
(push method around))
((null qualifier)
(push method primary))))))
(defgeneric wam-test-mc-a (val)
(:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-a))
(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-a 13)))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-a ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (= (wam-test-mc-a 13) 13))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-a :around ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (= (wam-test-mc-a 13) 26))
;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION
;;; When two methods are in the same method group and have the same
;;; specializers, their sort order within the group may be ambiguous. Therefore,
;;; we should throw an error when we have two methods in the same group with
;;; the same specializers /as long as/ we have more than one method group
;;; or our single method group qualifier-pattern is not *. This resolves the
;;; apparent conflict with the above 'It is also possible to bypass' language.
;;;
;;; The language specifying this behavior is:
;;; "Note that two methods with identical specializers, but with different
;;; qualifiers, are not ordered by the algorithm described in Step 2 of the
;;; method selection and combination process described in Section 7.6.6
;;; (Method Selection and Combination). Normally the two methods play different
;;; roles in the effective method because they have different qualifiers, and
;;; no matter how they are ordered in the result of Step 2, the effective
;;; method is the same. If the two methods play the same role and their order
;;; matters, an error is signaled. This happens as part of the qualifier
;;; pattern matching in define-method-combination."
;;;
;;; Note that the spec pretty much equates 'method group' and 'role'.
;; First we ensure that it fails correctly when there is more than one
;; method group
(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-b ()
((around (:around))
(primary * :required t))
(let ((form (if (rest primary)
`(call-method ,(first primary) ,(rest primary))
`(call-method ,(first primary)))))
(if around
`(call-method ,(first around) (,@(rest around)
(make-method ,form)))
form)))
(defgeneric wam-test-mc-b (val)
(:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-b))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-b ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (= (wam-test-mc-b 13) 13))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-b :around ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (= (wam-test-mc-b 13) 26))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-b :somethingelse ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-b 13)))
;;; now, ensure that it fails with a single group with a qualifier-pattern
;;; that is not *
(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-c ()
((methods listp :required t))
(if (rest methods)
`(call-method ,(first methods) ,(rest methods))
`(call-method ,(first methods))))
(defgeneric wam-test-mc-c (val)
(:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-c))
(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-c 13)))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-c :foo ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (= (wam-test-mc-c 13) 13))
(defmethod wam-test-mc-c :bar ((val number))
(+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-c 13)))
;;; DEFMETHOD should signal an ERROR if an incompatible lambda list is
;;; given:
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x) x)
(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x y) y)))
(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x &rest y) y)))
;;; Sneakily using a bit of MOPness to check some consistency
(assert (= (length
(sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'incompatible-ll-test-1)) 1))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x &key bar) bar)
(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x) x)))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x &rest y) y)
(assert (= (length
(sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'incompatible-ll-test-2)) 1))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 ((x integer) &key bar) bar)
(assert (= (length
(sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'incompatible-ll-test-2)) 2))
;;; Per Christophe, this is an illegal method call because of 7.6.5
(assert (raises-error? (incompatible-ll-test-2 t 1 2)))
(assert (eq (incompatible-ll-test-2 1 :bar 'yes) 'yes))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-3 ((x integer)) x)
(remove-method #'incompatible-ll-test-3
(find-method #'incompatible-ll-test-3
nil
(list (find-class 'integer))))
(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-3 (x y) (list x y))))
;;; Attempting to instantiate classes with forward references in their
;;; CPL should signal errors (FIXME: of what type?)
(defclass never-finished-class (this-one-unfinished-too) ())
(multiple-value-bind (result error)
(ignore-errors (make-instance 'never-finished-class))
(assert (null result))
(assert (typep error 'error)))
(multiple-value-bind (result error)
(ignore-errors (make-instance 'this-one-unfinished-too))
(assert (null result))
(assert (typep error 'error)))
;;; Classes with :ALLOCATION :CLASS slots should be subclassable (and
;;; weren't for a while in sbcl-0.7.9.xx)
(defclass superclass-with-slot ()
((a :allocation :class)))
(defclass subclass-for-class-allocation (superclass-with-slot) ())
(make-instance 'subclass-for-class-allocation)
;;; bug #136: CALL-NEXT-METHOD was being a little too lexical,
;;; resulting in failure in the following:
(defmethod call-next-method-lexical-args ((x integer))
x)
(defmethod call-next-method-lexical-args :around ((x integer))
(let ((x (1+ x)))
(call-next-method)))
(assert (= (call-next-method-lexical-args 3) 3))
;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION with arguments was hopelessly broken
;;; until 0.7.9.5x
(defvar *d-m-c-args-test* nil)
(define-method-combination progn-with-lock ()
((methods ()))
(:arguments object)
`(unwind-protect
(progn (lock (object-lock ,object))
,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method)
`(call-method ,method))
methods))
(unlock (object-lock ,object))))
(defun object-lock (obj)
(push "object-lock" *d-m-c-args-test*)
obj)
(defun unlock (obj)
(push "unlock" *d-m-c-args-test*)
obj)
(defun lock (obj)
(push "lock" *d-m-c-args-test*)
obj)
(defgeneric d-m-c-args-test (x)
(:method-combination progn-with-lock))
(defmethod d-m-c-args-test ((x symbol))
(push "primary" *d-m-c-args-test*))
(defmethod d-m-c-args-test ((x number))
(error "foo"))
(assert (equal (d-m-c-args-test t) '("primary" "lock" "object-lock")))
(assert (equal *d-m-c-args-test*
'("unlock" "object-lock" "primary" "lock" "object-lock")))
(setf *d-m-c-args-test* nil)
(ignore-errors (d-m-c-args-test 1))
(assert (equal *d-m-c-args-test*
'("unlock" "object-lock" "lock" "object-lock")))
;;; The walker (on which DEFMETHOD depended) didn't know how to handle
;;; SYMBOL-MACROLET properly. In fact, as of sbcl-0.7.10.20 it still
;;; doesn't, but it does well enough to compile the following without
;;; error (the problems remain in asking for a complete macroexpansion
;;; of an arbitrary form).
(symbol-macrolet ((x 1))
(defmethod bug222 (z)
(macrolet ((frob (form) `(progn ,form ,x)))
(frob (print x)))))
(assert (= (bug222 t) 1))
;;; also, a test case to guard against bogus environment hacking:
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
(setq bug222-b 3))
;;; this should at the least compile:
(let ((bug222-b 1))
(defmethod bug222-b (z stream)
(macrolet ((frob (form) `(progn ,form ,bug222-b)))
(frob (format stream "~D~%" bug222-b)))))
;;; and it would be nice (though not specified by ANSI) if the answer
;;; were as follows:
(let ((x (make-string-output-stream)))
(let ((value (bug222-b t x)))
;; not specified by ANSI
#+#.(cl:if (cl:eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile) '(and) '(or))
(assert (= value 3)))
;; specified.
(assert (char= (char (get-output-stream-string x) 0) #\1)))
;;; REINITIALIZE-INSTANCE, in the ctor optimization, wasn't checking
;;; for invalid initargs where it should:
(defclass class234 () ())
(defclass subclass234 (class234) ())
(defvar *bug234* 0)
(defun bug-234 ()
(reinitialize-instance (make-instance 'class234) :dummy 0))
(defun subbug-234 ()
(reinitialize-instance (make-instance 'subclass234) :dummy 0))
(assert (raises-error? (bug-234) program-error))
(defmethod shared-initialize :after ((i class234) slots &key dummy)
(incf *bug234*))
(assert (typep (subbug-234) 'subclass234))
(assert (= *bug234*
;; once for MAKE-INSTANCE, once for REINITIALIZE-INSTANCE
2))
;;; also, some combinations of MAKE-INSTANCE and subclassing missed
;;; new methods (Gerd Moellmann sbcl-devel 2002-12-29):
(defclass class234-b1 () ())
(defclass class234-b2 (class234-b1) ())
(defvar *bug234-b* 0)
(defun bug234-b ()
(make-instance 'class234-b2))
(compile 'bug234-b)
(bug234-b)
(assert (= *bug234-b* 0))
(defmethod initialize-instance :before ((x class234-b1) &rest args)
(declare (ignore args))
(incf *bug234-b*))
(bug234-b)
(assert (= *bug234-b* 1))
;;; we should be able to make classes with uninterned names:
(defclass #:class-with-uninterned-name () ())
;;; SLOT-MISSING should be called when there are missing slots.
(defclass class-with-all-slots-missing () ())
(defmethod slot-missing (class (o class-with-all-slots-missing)
slot-name op
&optional new-value)
op)
(assert (eq (slot-value (make-instance 'class-with-all-slots-missing) 'foo)
'slot-value))
(assert (eq (funcall (lambda (x) (slot-value x 'bar))
(make-instance 'class-with-all-slots-missing))
'slot-value))
(assert (eq (funcall (lambda (x) (setf (slot-value x 'baz) 'baz))
(make-instance 'class-with-all-slots-missing))
;; SLOT-MISSING's value is specified to be ignored; we
;; return NEW-VALUE.
'baz))
;;; we should be able to specialize on anything that names a class.
(defclass name-for-class () ())
(defmethod something-that-specializes ((x name-for-class)) 1)
(setf (find-class 'other-name-for-class) (find-class 'name-for-class))
(defmethod something-that-specializes ((x other-name-for-class)) 2)
(assert (= (something-that-specializes (make-instance 'name-for-class)) 2))
(assert (= (something-that-specializes (make-instance 'other-name-for-class))
2))
;;; more forward referenced classes stuff
(defclass frc-1 (frc-2) ())
(assert (subtypep 'frc-1 (find-class 'frc-2)))
(assert (subtypep (find-class 'frc-1) 'frc-2))
(assert (not (subtypep (find-class 'frc-2) 'frc-1)))
(defclass frc-2 (frc-3) ((a :initarg :a)))
(assert (subtypep 'frc-1 (find-class 'frc-3)))
(defclass frc-3 () ())
(assert (typep (make-instance 'frc-1 :a 2) (find-class 'frc-1)))
(assert (typep (make-instance 'frc-2 :a 3) (find-class 'frc-2)))
;;; check that we can define classes with two slots of different names
;;; (even if it STYLE-WARNs).
(defclass odd-name-class ()
((name :initarg :name)
(cl-user::name :initarg :name2)))
(let ((x (make-instance 'odd-name-class :name 1 :name2 2)))
(assert (= (slot-value x 'name) 1))
(assert (= (slot-value x 'cl-user::name) 2)))
;;; ALLOCATE-INSTANCE should work on structures, even if defined by
;;; DEFSTRUCT (and not DEFCLASS :METACLASS STRUCTURE-CLASS).
(defstruct allocatable-structure a)
(assert (typep (allocate-instance (find-class 'allocatable-structure))
'allocatable-structure))
;;; Bug found by Paul Dietz when devising CPL tests: somewhat
;;; amazingly, calls to CPL would work a couple of times, and then
;;; start returning NIL. A fix was found (relating to the
;;; applicability of constant-dfun optimization) by Gerd Moellmann.
(defgeneric cpl (x)
(:method-combination list)
(:method list ((x broadcast-stream)) 'broadcast-stream)
(:method list ((x integer)) 'integer)
(:method list ((x number)) 'number)
(:method list ((x stream)) 'stream)
(:method list ((x structure-object)) 'structure-object))
(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
'(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
'(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
'(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
;;; Bug in CALL-NEXT-METHOD: assignment to the method's formal
;;; parameters shouldn't affect the arguments to the next method for a
;;; no-argument call to CALL-NEXT-METHOD
(defgeneric cnm-assignment (x)
(:method (x) x)
(:method ((x integer)) (setq x 3)
(list x (call-next-method) (call-next-method x))))
(assert (equal (cnm-assignment 1) '(3 1 3)))
;;; Bug reported by Istvan Marko 2003-07-09
(let ((class-name (gentemp)))
(loop for i from 1 to 9
for slot-name = (intern (format nil "X~D" i))
for initarg-name = (intern (format nil "X~D" i) :keyword)
collect `(,slot-name :initarg ,initarg-name) into slot-descs
append `(,initarg-name (list 0)) into default-initargs
finally (eval `(defclass ,class-name ()
(,@slot-descs)
(:default-initargs ,@default-initargs))))
(let ((f (compile nil `(lambda () (make-instance ',class-name)))))
(assert (typep (funcall f) class-name))))
;;; bug 262: DEFMETHOD failed on a generic function without a lambda
;;; list
(ensure-generic-function 'bug262)
(defmethod bug262 (x y)
(list x y))
(assert (equal (bug262 1 2) '(1 2)))
;;; salex on #lisp 2003-10-13 reported that type declarations inside
;;; WITH-SLOTS are too hairy to be checked
(defun ensure-no-notes (form)
(handler-case (compile nil `(lambda () ,form))
(sb-ext:compiler-note (c)
;; FIXME: it would be better to check specifically for the "type
;; is too hairy" note
(error c))))
(defvar *x*)
(ensure-no-notes '(with-slots (a) *x*
(declare (integer a))
a))
(ensure-no-notes '(with-slots (a) *x*
(declare (integer a))
(declare (notinline slot-value))
a))
;;; from CLHS 7.6.5.1
(defclass character-class () ((char :initarg :char)))
(defclass picture-class () ((glyph :initarg :glyph)))
(defclass character-picture-class (character-class picture-class) ())
(defmethod width ((c character-class) &key font) font)
(defmethod width ((p picture-class) &key pixel-size) pixel-size)
(assert (raises-error?
(width (make-instance 'character-class :char #\Q)
:font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
program-error))
(assert (raises-error?
(width (make-instance 'picture-class :glyph #\Q)
:font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
program-error))
(assert (eq (width (make-instance 'character-picture-class :char #\Q)
:font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
'baskerville))
;;; class redefinition shouldn't give any warnings, in the usual case
(defclass about-to-be-redefined () ((some-slot :accessor some-slot)))
(handler-bind ((warning #'error))
(defclass about-to-be-redefined () ((some-slot :accessor some-slot))))
;;; attempts to add accessorish methods to generic functions with more
;;; complex lambda lists should fail
(defgeneric accessoroid (object &key &allow-other-keys))
(assert (raises-error?
(defclass accessoroid-class () ((slot :accessor accessoroid)))
program-error))
;;; reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-04-15
(defclass shared-slot-and-redefinition ()
((size :initarg :size :initform 1 :allocation :class)))
(let ((i (make-instance 'shared-slot-and-redefinition)))
(defclass shared-slot-and-redefinition ()
((size :initarg :size :initform 2 :allocation :class)))
(assert (= (slot-value i 'size) 1)))
;;; reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-04-15
(defclass superclass-born-to-be-obsoleted () (a))
(defclass subclass-born-to-be-obsoleted (superclass-born-to-be-obsoleted) ())
(defparameter *born-to-be-obsoleted*
(make-instance 'subclass-born-to-be-obsoleted))
(defparameter *born-to-be-obsoleted-obsoleted* nil)
(defmethod update-instance-for-redefined-class
((o subclass-born-to-be-obsoleted) a d pl &key)
(setf *born-to-be-obsoleted-obsoleted* t))
(make-instances-obsolete 'superclass-born-to-be-obsoleted)
(slot-boundp *born-to-be-obsoleted* 'a)
(assert *born-to-be-obsoleted-obsoleted*)
;;; additional test suggested by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-04-21
(defclass super-super-obsoleted () (a))
(defclass super-obsoleted-1 (super-super-obsoleted) ())
(defclass super-obsoleted-2 (super-super-obsoleted) ())
(defclass obsoleted (super-obsoleted-1 super-obsoleted-2) ())
(defparameter *obsoleted* (make-instance 'obsoleted))
(defparameter *obsoleted-counter* 0)
(defmethod update-instance-for-redefined-class ((o obsoleted) a d pl &key)
(incf *obsoleted-counter*))
(make-instances-obsolete 'super-super-obsoleted)
(slot-boundp *obsoleted* 'a)
(assert (= *obsoleted-counter* 1))
;;; yet another MAKE-INSTANCES-OBSOLETE test, this time from Nikodemus
;;; Siivola. Not all methods for accessing slots are created equal...
(defclass yet-another-obsoletion-super () ((obs :accessor obs-of :initform 0)))
(defclass yet-another-obsoletion-sub (yet-another-obsoletion-super) ())
(defmethod shared-initialize :after ((i yet-another-obsoletion-super)
slots &rest init)
(incf (obs-of i)))
(defvar *yao-super* (make-instance 'yet-another-obsoletion-super))
(defvar *yao-sub* (make-instance 'yet-another-obsoletion-sub))
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-super*) 1))
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-sub*) 1))
(make-instances-obsolete 'yet-another-obsoletion-super)
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-sub*) 2))
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-super*) 2))
(make-instances-obsolete 'yet-another-obsoletion-super)
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-super*) 3))
(assert (= (obs-of *yao-sub*) 3))
(assert (= (slot-value *yao-super* 'obs) 3))
(assert (= (slot-value *yao-sub* 'obs) 3))
;;; one more MIO test: variable slot names
(defclass mio () ((x :initform 42)))
(defvar *mio-slot* 'x)
(defparameter *mio-counter* 0)
(defmethod update-instance-for-redefined-class ((instance mio) new old plist &key)
(incf *mio-counter*))
(let ((x (make-instance 'mio)))
(make-instances-obsolete 'mio)
(slot-value x *mio-slot*))
(let ((x (make-instance 'mio)))
(make-instances-obsolete 'mio)
(setf (slot-value x *mio-slot*) 13))
(let ((x (make-instance 'mio)))
(make-instances-obsolete 'mio)
(slot-boundp x *mio-slot*))
(let ((x (make-instance 'mio)))
(make-instances-obsolete 'mio)
(slot-makunbound x *mio-slot*))
(assert (= 4 *mio-counter*))
;;; shared -> local slot transfers of inherited slots, reported by
;;; Bruno Haible
(let (i)
(defclass super-with-magic-slot ()
((magic :initarg :size :initform 1 :allocation :class)))
(defclass sub-of-super-with-magic-slot (super-with-magic-slot) ())
(setq i (make-instance 'sub-of-super-with-magic-slot))
(defclass super-with-magic-slot ()
((magic :initarg :size :initform 2)))
(assert (= 1 (slot-value i 'magic))))
;;; MAKE-INSTANCES-OBSOLETE return values
(defclass one-more-to-obsolete () ())
(assert (eq 'one-more-to-obsolete
(make-instances-obsolete 'one-more-to-obsolete)))
(assert (eq (find-class 'one-more-to-obsolete)
(make-instances-obsolete (find-class 'one-more-to-obsolete))))
;;; Sensible error instead of a BUG. Reported by Thomas Burdick.
(multiple-value-bind (value err)
(ignore-errors
(defclass slot-def-with-duplicate-accessors ()
((slot :writer get-slot :reader get-slot))))
(assert (typep err 'error))
(assert (not (typep err 'sb-int:bug))))
;;; BUG 321: errors in parsing DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION arguments
;;; lambda lists.
(define-method-combination w-args ()
((method-list *))
(:arguments arg1 arg2 &aux (extra :extra))
`(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (method) `(call-method ,method)) method-list)))
(defgeneric mc-test-w-args (p1 p2 s)
(:method-combination w-args)
(:method ((p1 number) (p2 t) s)
(vector-push-extend (list 'number p1 p2) s))
(:method ((p1 string) (p2 t) s)
(vector-push-extend (list 'string p1 p2) s))
(:method ((p1 t) (p2 t) s) (vector-push-extend (list t p1 p2) s)))
(let ((v (make-array 0 :adjustable t :fill-pointer t)))
(assert (= (mc-test-w-args 1 2 v) 1))
(assert (equal (aref v 0) '(number 1 2)))
(assert (equal (aref v 1) '(t 1 2))))
;;; BUG 276: declarations and mutation.