0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.7

Remove mailing list address from "please report this as a bug" message in gc-common.c. Minor edit to manual page
akovalenko · Aug 3, 2002 · 78042f2 · 78042f2
1 parent 1a823f1
commit 78042f2
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/doc/sbcl.1 b/doc/sbcl.1
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ SAVE-LISP does.
 
 (Why doesn't SBCL support more extensions? Why drop all those nice
 extensions from CMU CL when the code already exists? This is a
-frequently asked question on the mailing list. In other cases, it's a
+frequently asked question on the mailing list. In some cases, it's a
 design philosophy issue: arguably SBCL has done its job by supplying a
 stable FFI, and the right design decision is to move functionality
 derived from that, like socket support, into separate libraries,

diff --git a/src/runtime/gc-common.c b/src/runtime/gc-common.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ scavenge(lispobj *start, long n_words)
 
 	    if ((scavtab[type]==scav_lose) ||
 		(((scavtab[type])(start,object))>1)) {
-		fprintf(stderr,"warning: attempted to scavenge non-descriptor value %x at %p.  If you can\nreproduce this warning, send a test case to sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net\n",
+		fprintf(stderr,"warning: attempted to scavenge non-descriptor value %x at %p.  If you can\nreproduce this warning, send a bug report (see manual page for details)\n",
 			object,start);
 	    }
 	}

diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
 ;;; for internal versions, especially for internal versions off the
 ;;; main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
 
-"0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.6"
+"0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.7"