Skip to content

akpatro-github/single_ended_sram

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

29 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

A comparative study of 6T SRAM with 6T SE-SRAM cell

Table of Contents

Methodology

  • Memory size:- 1k X 32-bit
  • Operating voltage:- 5V
  • Used Techonology:- 0.5um SCMOS technique
  • Access time:- <30ns
  • Tools used:- NGSpice, Magic, Sue2

Standard 6T SRAM cell

The standard 6T SRAM cell consists of two back to back inverter for storing the data and two access transistors for read and write operation.

Block diagram

SRAM_6t

Pre-Layout Simulation

clk sync

layout

layout_sram

Layout has been done by open-source layout tool Magic.

SE-SRAM cell

The single-ended 6T SRAM cell consists of two cross-coupled inverters connected to bitline(BL) with an access transistor (M5) and a data storage node isolation transistor (M6). For Read operation, a read assist transistor(Mra) is connected with an M6 transistor. One of the Inverter consists of a write assist transistor (Mwa) as shown in the figure. The read operation is controlled by the read assist transistor (Mra) by giving an input R. Similarly, the write operation is controlled by the write assist transistor (Mwa) and access transistor (M5) which depends upon the input W0 and WL.

Block Diagram

sesram1

Pre-layout simulation

se_sram

Layout

layout_sesram

Comparative analysis between standard 6t with SE-SRAM cell

SNM (Static Noise Margin):-

6T SRAM cell

snm_sram

SE-SRAM cell

snm_sesram

Read SNM for different PVT corners

snm_pvt

The single ended 6T bitcell provides 4.5X higher worst-case read SNM as compared to the standard 6T SRAM bitcell under the same process variations.

Write-stability

write_stability

The write trip point voltage of a proposed 6T is 28% (1.4V) higher than the standard 6T. Thus the single ended 6T design has a little bit of high write ability than the standard 6T design. However, it has an advantage since an erroneous write will not take place easily compared to standard 6T cell.

Conclusion

This project presents a 6T SE-SRAM cell. In the proposed 6T SE SRAM Cell :

  • Read current path is isolated from the data storage node Q and QB and, hence less vulnerable to noise.
  • Isolation of read current path improves the SNM > 4x compared to standard 6T Cell
  • Strong write ability compared to standard 6T cell using MOSIS 0.5um CMOS technology.

Contributor

Acknowledgement

  • Dr.Saroj Rout, Associate Professor, Silicon Institute of Technology
  • Mr.Santunu sarangi, Assistant professor, Silicon Institute of Technology

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages