Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(scalable): ✨ add inverse, retrograde getters to ScalableIterable #287

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2023
Merged

feat(scalable): ✨ add inverse, retrograde getters to ScalableIterable #287

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2023

Conversation

albertms10
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@albertms10 albertms10 added enhancement New feature or request test The code needs to implement tests labels Oct 7, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 added this to the Road to 0.13 milestone Oct 7, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 self-assigned this Oct 7, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 modified the milestones: Road to 0.13, Road to 0.14 Nov 1, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7328299771

  • 13 of 13 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7325266077: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 996
Relevant Lines: 996
💛 - Coveralls

@albertms10 albertms10 marked this pull request as ready for review December 26, 2023 09:33
@albertms10 albertms10 merged commit 78b3e5b into main Dec 26, 2023
3 checks passed
@albertms10 albertms10 deleted the feat/add-inverse-retrograde-getters-to-scalable-iterable branch December 26, 2023 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@albertms10 albertms10

Labels
enhancement New feature or request test The code needs to implement tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Road to 0.14
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@albertms10 @coveralls