Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(quality): 🐛 address wrong isDissonant condition for ImperfectQuality #449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

fix(quality): 🐛 address wrong isDissonant condition for ImperfectQuality #449

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

albertms10
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@albertms10 albertms10 added bug Something isn't working test The code needs to implement tests labels Mar 18, 2024
@albertms10 albertms10 added this to the Road to 0.18 milestone Mar 18, 2024
@albertms10 albertms10 self-assigned this Mar 18, 2024
@albertms10 albertms10 merged commit 5eaeb0c into main Mar 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8335224159

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8319332021: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1121
Relevant Lines: 1121
💛 - Coveralls

@albertms10 albertms10 deleted the fix/address-wrong-is-dissonant-condition-for-imperfect-quality branch March 18, 2024 23:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@albertms10 albertms10

Labels
bug Something isn't working test The code needs to implement tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Road to 0.18
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@albertms10 @coveralls