Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new release 0.2.0 #53

Closed
orbeckst opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 11 comments
Closed

new release 0.2.0 #53

orbeckst opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 11 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

We reached the "Immediate/Pressing" milestones in our roadmap and have a whole bunch of new features as well as really good testing coverage.

I'd like to release a 0.2.0 once the latest Amber parser changes are in. (If we can get a NAMD parser, too, then that would be a bonus, but I don't know what the time line is for that)

Is there anything else that we need to take care of, @alchemistry/alchemlyb ?

@orbeckst orbeckst added this to the release 0.2.0 milestone Jan 16, 2018
@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

I'd also like to remove the "alpha state" warning

This library is in an alpha state. The library and the documentation is incomplete. Use in production at your own risk.

Some of us are using alchemlyb in a production environment already and the tests and docs are reasonable.

Instead I like to add something along the lines that we welcome user input, especially in the form of bug reports, feature requests, and questions and that they should please use the issue tracker. I would also say that the library is still in development; our releases use semantic versioning so that users can immediately see what is happening in a release.

I'll also start a CHANGELOG.

orbeckst added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2018
- removed all references to gitter
- added Contributing section and links to some of our wiki pages
orbeckst added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2018
* doc update (see #53)
  - removed all references to gitter
  - added Contributing section and links to some of our wiki pages
* updates for docs for Amber parsers
@davidlmobley
Copy link

@vtlim do you want to comment on timing for NAMD parser? This is really "no pressure" -- we're not in a rush to have it in, so we're interested in knowing when you think you would be likely to get to it, and NOT trying to apply pressure to get it done.

@vtlim
Copy link
Collaborator

vtlim commented Jan 22, 2018

I will plan to get to it later this week or next. I'll first take a look at the GROMACS or other parsers present to figure out how I need to morph mine accordingly.

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

The release is blocked on

We can ship something without the NAMD parser #7 so I removed it from the milestone.

@orbeckst orbeckst self-assigned this Jul 18, 2019
@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

orbeckst commented Aug 1, 2019

Everything is ready for a 0.2.0 release. I'll try to make a little bit of time to get it out by the end of the week.

@dotsdl
Copy link
Member

dotsdl commented Aug 3, 2019

Thanks @orbeckst! Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help; I don't recall if we shared PyPI permissions for publishing packages there.

@dotsdl
Copy link
Member

dotsdl commented Aug 3, 2019

Just checked, and currently I'm the sole collaborator on the PyPI package. If you can send me your PyPI username I can add you as an owner as well.

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

orbeckst commented Aug 3, 2019

@dotsdl
Copy link
Member

dotsdl commented Aug 3, 2019

Done!

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

orbeckst commented Aug 6, 2019

alchemlyb and alchemtest 0.3.0 are released.

(Yes, it should have been 0.2.0 but I accidentally labelled alchemtest already as 0.3.0 and then alchemlyb followed suite. There's no deeper reason. With semantic versioning this is not going to be a problem, we just can't backdate anything.)

@dotsdl
Copy link
Member

dotsdl commented Aug 6, 2019

Thanks @orbeckst! I think 0.3.0 is totally appropriate. Thanks for pushing it through!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants