Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the dapps section #50

Closed
LeeAlephium opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Remove the dapps section #50

LeeAlephium opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@LeeAlephium
Copy link
Contributor

The entire dapps section can be removed since it's not ready for primetime; even the pages that appear done are definitely not compatible day-to-day with the evolution of things

@LeeAlephium LeeAlephium added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 28, 2022
@nop33
Copy link
Member

nop33 commented Jun 28, 2022

Some pages could stay, we need to link to something from the "Build" card of our website. https://alephium.org/

@LeeAlephium
Copy link
Contributor Author

LeeAlephium commented Jun 28, 2022

Anything to do with dApps can't be documented until dApp functionality is ready for the public to use... The wiki is a public resource so it only makes sense to provide information which can actually be used by the public (this was not my original stance on the wiki but it's changed since my understanding of its goals weren't correct)

We should probably not provide a "Build" card unless we create a page describing how people can build on Alephium in a way other than using dApps

nop33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2022
@Sakrecoer
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #52 Not sure why this issue didn't auto-close. Closing manually

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants