Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

English gloss in a dictionary item #55

Closed
DuMeigui opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

English gloss in a dictionary item #55

DuMeigui opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@DuMeigui
Copy link

DuMeigui commented Jul 3, 2020

Dictionary item: \lx ho˧ɕjæ˩
\ge currently: cord_to_which_fire_is_put
\de currently: Cord to which fire is put in order to shoot.

Suggest change to:
\ge fuse (Or possibly fuse cord)
\de Fuse for lighting gunpowder, fireworks etc. (Is this accurate? I'm guessing the context here.)

@alexis-michaud
Copy link
Owner

\lx ho˧ɕjæ˩
\sf <nb="B"> 618
\sf <nb="2011"> 911
\or hoxae
\bw <langue="cmn"> 火线
\ps n
\lc ho˧ɕjæ˩
\de Cord to which fire is put in order to shoot.
\ge 火线::cord_to_which_fire_is_put
\dn 火绳,导火索
\gn 导火索
\gr 火线
\df Mèche.
\gf 火线::mèche

image

I had a misconception that flintlock guns operated in the same way as bombs or firecrackers, with a cord (fuse) that burns until it reaches the gunpowder. On checking, I realize that this is not the case: when shooting with an arquebus and the like, the fuse was not on the gun itself, but held in the hand and brought in contact with the gunpowder in order to shoot.

I guess the term would apply for fireworks (firecrackers). I did not ask.

So in English, 'wick' is for a candle, and 'fuse' for guns / explosives! Thanks for pointing this out! I did not know this use of the word 'fuse', only the contemporary term in electricity (interestingly, the technique of electric fuses is derived from the older technique). Good to know.

Here we go:
\ge fuse_cord
\de Fuse cord for lighting gunpowder, fireworks etc.

alexis-michaud added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2020
plus routine updates
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants