A month ago when I first developed a non-commercial project using ReasonML, I got a new experience, is a functional programming. This language is an alternative syntax from OCaml. OCaml itself is a purely functional language, the features offered are interesting. For example: type inference, strongly type system, algebraic datatypes, and many more. Interesting right?
Now after trying that, I began to interest functional programming. Finally i tried to implement the functional paradigm in a different language, namely Rust.
Functional programming (FP) is a programming paradigm which allows us to write expressive, concise, and elegant code. Functional programming also helps developers to manage code so that it doesn't DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) that's mean doesn't write the same code over and over again. Other functional languages for example like Lisp, Clojure, Erlang, Haskell, R, and many more.
The question is, is a Rust functional language? the answer is, no. Although Rust himself was inspired by ML family of language, Rust it's not functional. But fortunately Rust has several features that are similar to other functional languages, such as: algebraic datatypes, expressive types, and others.
In order not to jump right away, it would be nice if we had to know several data types in Rust. This also applies to all programming languages.
The most basic datatype is the simple true / false value, in Rust it's called bool
let x = true;
let y: bool = false;The char data type has a single Unicode value. We can use char data type with a single tick (')
let x = 'x';
let two_hearts = '💕';Unlike some other languages, char in Rust is not one byte, but four.
Rust has several numeric type category variants, such as signed(i) dan unsigned(u), fixed size (8, 16, 32, 64) dan variable(isize, usize) types.
let x = 42; // `x` has type `i32`.
let y = 1.0; // `y` has type `f64`.Like many other programming languages, Rust also has an array data type. By default, arrays in Rust can't be changed. Unless you initialize it with mut
let a = [1, 2, 3]; // a: [i32; 3]
let mut m = [1, 2, 3]; // m: [i32; 3]Functions also have data types! For example like:
fn foo(x: i32) -> i32 { x }
let x: fn(i32) -> i32 = foo;In this case, the foo () function has a return type numeric: i32, and returns the value x.
For more information, you can check here: primitive types
"Closure is a mechanism by which an inner function will have access to the variables defined in its outer function’s lexical scope even after the outer function has returned."
Up to here understand? in short closures is an inner function that has access to retrieve a value throughout the scope both inside and outside.
fn fmt(prev_str: &str) -> String {
let mut new_str = String::new();
let closure_annotated = |next_str| -> String {
new_str.push_str(prev_str);
new_str.push_str(next_str);
return new_str;
};
closure_annotated("dolor sit amet")
}
let r_txt = "Lorem ipsum ";
assert_eq!("Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet", fmt(r_txt));In this case, in new_str.push_str () section where closure_annotated accesses the new_str variable then changes the value and returns it outside the scope.
Currying is a process in functional programming in which we can transform a function with multiple arguments into a sequence of nesting functions. It returns a new function that expects the next argument inline.
#[derive(Debug)]
struct States<'a> {
a: &'a i32,
b: &'a i32,
}
trait Currying {
type ReturnType: Fn(i32) -> i32;
fn add(self) -> Self::ReturnType;
}
impl Currying for States<'static>{
type ReturnType = Box<dyn Fn(i32) -> i32>;
fn add(self) -> Self::ReturnType {
Box::new(move|x| {
x * self.a
})
}
}
let r_value: States = States {
a: &100,
b: &100
};
let r1 = r_value.add();
let r2 = r1(5);
assert_eq!(500, r2);There are 2 parameters here, namely a,b where each has a numeric data type, then in trait section is a function interface, a place for initializing functions. These traits are similar to typescript interfaces.
Higher order functions are functions that use other functions as parameters or as a result of returns.
fn map<F>(arr: &[i32], func: F) -> Vec<i32> where F: Fn(&i32) -> i32{
let mut new_array: Vec<i32> = vec![];
for i in arr.iter() {
new_array.push(func(i))
}
return new_array
}
let lists = vec![1, 4, 9, 16];
let result = map(&lists, |i| *i + 2);
assert_eq!(vec![3, 6, 11, 18], result)So func and map are higher order functions, where this function is used to change every contents of an array. The return result is a new array of the same length as the modified originalArray.
Lazy evaluation or non-strict evaluation is a process of holding the evaluation of an expression/function until the value is needed. The goal is to avoid repeated evaluations.
struct State {
x: i32,
}
trait Lazy {
fn add(&self) -> i32;
fn multiply(&self) -> i32;
fn add_or_multiply(&self, add: bool) -> i32;
}
impl Lazy for State {
fn add(&self) -> i32 {
println!("executing add");
&self.x + &self.x
}
fn multiply(&self) -> i32 {
println!("executing multiply");
&self.x * &self.x
}
fn add_or_multiply(&self, add: bool) -> i32 {
match add {
true => self.add(),
false => self.multiply(),
}
}
}
let val: State = State {
x: 20
};
assert_eq!(40, val.add_or_multiply(true));
assert_eq!(400, val.add_or_multiply(false));Functional programming (FP) provides many advantages, and its popularity has been increasing as a result. However, each programming paradigm comes with its own unique jargon and FP is no exception. By providing a glossary, i hope to make learning FP easier✌️