Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UCI option Time-Per-Move ? #9

Closed
tissatussa opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

UCI option Time-Per-Move ? #9

tissatussa opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@tissatussa
Copy link

i noticed Blunder can not do time-per-move in CuteChess !? This happens with v6.0.0 and v7.2.0 .. i tested both compiled versions and your assets .. is this UCI option not implemented ? When i set time-per-whole-game all is OK ..

I'm on Xubuntu 20.04 and CuteChess v1.2.0

@deanmchris
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tissatussa , yes, you are correct. If you're referring to the UCI option "movetime", it's not currently implemented. Thanks for bringing this to my attention again, I'll make sure this is implemented in the next version release of Blunder, which will hopefully be before the end of the year.

@tissatussa
Copy link
Author

Take your time to implement this.
I would be honoured !

Using RubiChess in a film · Issue #315 · Matthies_RubiChess - github com - edit

Oops !

@deanmchris
Copy link
Owner

@tissatussa sure, no problem. I'd like Blunder to be a complete chess engine eventually, and that means supporting all the basics of the UCI protocol. And thanks for the shoutout! But I suppose it was deleted since the repository author may not have considered it in the best taste to promote another engine in that place.

@tissatussa
Copy link
Author

tissatussa commented Dec 1, 2021

yeah .. i can IMAGINE that :-) [ https://www.bitchute.com/video/fQcz6HI6PI2R/ ]

@deanmchris
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tissatussa I've just released a new version where movetime is supported, some I'm closing this issue. Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants