Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose rule.consequence.promote.objectIDs string array #1155

Closed
aseure opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1156
Closed

Expose rule.consequence.promote.objectIDs string array #1155

aseure opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1156
Labels

Comments

@aseure
Copy link
Contributor

aseure commented May 20, 2020

On top of the existing objectID (singular) string field, a new objectIDs
(plural) string array field is now be exposed in the rule.consequence.promote
Rule object representation. This lets the user easily promote a full group of
objects without letting some priority conflicts to shift some objects at the end
of the promoted object list.

@Haroenv
Copy link
Contributor

Haroenv commented May 20, 2020

Haroenv added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2020
doesn't have a test yet, but allows you to base on top of this.

fixes #1155
nunomaduro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2020
doesn't have a test yet, but allows you to base on top of this.

fixes #1155
nunomaduro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2020
doesn't have a test yet, but allows you to base on top of this.

fixes #1155
@nunomaduro
Copy link
Contributor

This feature can't be merged yet: algolia/algoliasearch-client-specs-internal#118.

Haroenv added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2020
* feat(rule): add group promotes

doesn't have a test yet, but allows you to base on top of this.

fixes #1155

* prettier

* chore(group-promotes): fixes object ids readonly type

Co-authored-by: Nuno Maduro <enunomaduro@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants