Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

Add a config option for extra extensions to index #60

Merged

Conversation

tkfu
Copy link
Contributor

@tkfu tkfu commented Sep 27, 2017

Jekyll can be extended to parse file formats other than markdown.
However, jekyll algolia push ignores them by default. This adds
a config option to specify additional extensions to be indexed.

fixes #61

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 27, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling bc340f0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into ** on algolia:develop**.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling bc340f0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into ** on algolia:develop**.

@tkfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkfu commented Sep 27, 2017

Note: The TravisCI failures are also there on the base branch.

Copy link
Contributor

@Haroenv Haroenv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very good! thanks

@tkfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkfu commented Oct 12, 2017

Any update on this @pixelastic? I need this (or some other solution to #61) merged, and an updated version of the gem to be available, before I can actually start using algolia.

@Haroenv
Copy link
Contributor

Haroenv commented Oct 12, 2017

Hey @tkfu, sorry for not being reactive faster, seems like this throws a deprecation warning on Jekyll 3, can you take a look at that?

@tkfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkfu commented Oct 12, 2017

It's because your develop branch is 15 commits behind master, and one of the missing commits is the one that fixed the deprecation warning. I could rebase this on master and make a PR to master instead, if you like?

@Haroenv
Copy link
Contributor

Haroenv commented Oct 12, 2017

I updated develop to contain the fix 😄

Jekyll can be extended to parse file formats other than markdown.
However, `jekyll algolia push` ignores them by default. This adds
a config option to specify additional extensions to be indexed.
@tkfu tkfu force-pushed the feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc branch from bc340f0 to 3d640d0 Compare October 13, 2017 09:42
@tkfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkfu commented Oct 13, 2017

I rebased and pushed--tests should now be passing.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3d640d0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into 93b95dd on algolia:develop.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3d640d0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into 93b95dd on algolia:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3d640d0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into 93b95dd on algolia:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3d640d0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into 93b95dd on algolia:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3d640d0 on advancedtelematic:feat/support-jekyll-asciidoc into 93b95dd on algolia:develop.

@redox redox merged commit 4e6b034 into algolia:develop Oct 15, 2017
@redox
Copy link
Contributor

redox commented Oct 15, 2017

Released and part of 0.9.0

@pixelastic
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @tkfu for the PR and thanks @redox and @Haroenv for taking care of the merge + release!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants