Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xGov-157: Centralised Bridge Proposal: Two-Way Cardano (ADA) to Algorand (Algo) #157

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

clooneyr
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Vidhyanandcs
Copy link
Contributor

As you are requesting for 260,000 Algo, why is the code not open source??

@GilesTNT
Copy link

As you are requesting for 260,000 Algo, why is the code not open source??

From our Discord Convo:
Bridges are (and should be) far more complex than typical smart-contract based dApps. There's more surface area with a bridge to attack because a bridge is distributed across two or more chains and relies on a higher degree of centralisation for custody of the bridged assets. There also isn't really an industry standard for bridges. Even the most well-funded bridges like Wormhole have been exploited, despite numerous audits and a large development team. It's possible we will open source it eventually, but the potential costs of exposing the bridge architecture to malicious actors is higher than any reason to open source the code too early. The three largest hacks in 2022 were bridge hacks AFAIK (Ronin Bridge $600m, Womhole $300m, Nomad Bridge $190m)

@clooneyr clooneyr changed the title xGov-157: Centralised Bridge Proposal: Cardano (ADA) to Algorand (Algo) xGov-157: Centralised Bridge Proposal: Two-Way Cardano (ADA) to Algorand (Algo) Feb 5, 2024
@nonfungibleab
Copy link
Contributor

Proposer, please post your algorand forum discussion thread link here. Thank you.

@SudoWeezy SudoWeezy merged commit c95dca2 into algorandfoundation:main Feb 7, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants