Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xGov-75 Social Impact Staking for Algo governance #75

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

CashdilloXGov
Copy link
Contributor

Innovative mechanism for generating Impact grants out of ALGO governance cycles

Innovative mechanism for generating Impact grants out of ALGO governance cycles
Category updated
@SudoWeezy SudoWeezy changed the title Social Impact Staking for Algo governance xGov-75 Social Impact Staking for Algo governance Oct 24, 2023
@makman88
Copy link

Bravo! Love this proposal. Happy to see a mechanism where our donation can be routed to the DAO without the need to take initial possession of funds, for obvious taxation reasons.

@github-actions github-actions bot added s-final and removed s-draft labels Jan 16, 2024
@nonfungibleab
Copy link
Contributor

Proposer, please post your algorand forum discussion thread link here. Thank you.

@CashdilloXGov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Proposer, please post your algorand forum discussion thread link here. Thank you.

Here it is: https://forum.algorand.org/t/social-impact-staking-proposal-for-next-governance-round/11331?u=cashdillo

@CashdilloXGov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Our proposal and advocacy piece for Social Impact Staking can be seen on the Algorand Forum in this thread. Please do share and support if you are a believer. https://forum.algorand.org/t/social-impact-staking-proposal-for-next-governance-round/11331

@CashdilloXGov
Copy link
Contributor Author

CashdilloXGov commented Feb 6, 2024 via email

@SudoWeezy SudoWeezy merged commit 245cbe0 into algorandfoundation:main Feb 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@SudoWeezy
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal have been removed, you can see the reason there #174

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants