Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(useFocusWithin): adjust ts definition #1666

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 16, 2022

Conversation

miracles1919
Copy link
Collaborator

[中文版模板 / Chinese template]

🤔 This is a ...

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Site / documentation update
  • Demo update
  • TypeScript definition update
  • Bundle size optimization
  • Performance optimization
  • Enhancement feature
  • Internationalization
  • Refactoring
  • Code style optimization
  • Test Case
  • Branch merge
  • Other (about what?)

🔗 Related issue link

💡 Background and solution

📝 Changelog

Language Changelog
🇺🇸 English try to optimize ts definition
🇨🇳 Chinese 尝试优化 ts 定义

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • TypeScript definition is updated/provided or not needed
  • Changelog is provided or not needed

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 13, 2022

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ miracles1919
❌ crazylxr
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@crazylxr crazylxr merged commit ca0dd12 into alibaba:master Jun 16, 2022
@miracles1919 miracles1919 deleted the types/useFocusWithin branch June 17, 2022 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants