Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed: #2018 #2150 #1343 解决跨组共享服务注册及调用 #2494

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

on36
Copy link

@on36 on36 commented Mar 30, 2022

Describe what this PR does / why we need it

解决跨组共享服务注册及跨组服务调用

Does this pull request fix one issue?

Fixes: #2018 #2150 #1343

Describe how you did it

Describe how to verify it

Special notes for reviews

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@steverao
Copy link
Collaborator

We had a discussion about this PR in tonight community meeting, someone though it's neccessary, but others didn't think so!

  1. For a framework, we need to have some rules that can help users avoid to make mistakes. If some users need it, maybe they can do it by themselves.
  2. We can provider the feature and set it default close.
    Welcome everyone leave your opinion in this PR below:)

@on36
Copy link
Author

on36 commented Apr 1, 2022

同一个环境下面存在不同业务线这种场景应该很多,既需要业务隔离,又需要公共业务功能(如组织人员,图片附件,订单,支付)能够共用,在微服务模式下,差不多就是这样的需要,如果调用的公共服务部署两套,这个既浪费资源又增加额外维护,我们使用场景中相当常见

@steverao steverao added the kind/discussion Mark as discussion issues/pr label Apr 3, 2022
@galaxy-sea
Copy link
Contributor

同样一个环境下面存在不同业务线的这种情况(很多,既需要业务隔离,又需要公共功能组织人员,图片附件,订单,支付)使用,在微服务模式下,需要差不多的这样的业务能力,如果增加调用的公共服务部署两套,这既浪费资源又额外维护,我们使用场景中相当频繁

你其实可以考虑用sidecar组件来解决你跨group调用的问题,这样子也符合nacos的group隔离策略

@steverao
Copy link
Collaborator

By community discussion, we don't plan to provide relevant function in community now and close first. Thank you for your support.

@steverao steverao closed this Sep 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/discussion Mark as discussion issues/pr
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

how to share default service
4 participants