Streamers auto registration

[sbinet]

No description provided.

[sbinet]

ping @aphecetche
are you ok with these cosmetic renames + consolidation?

[aphecetche]

@sbinet won't have time to properly review this until next week, but if you need to merge it, please go ahead.

[sbinet]

this can wait next week.

[aphecetche]

@sbinet just to be sure I understand what you did : you "integrated" the streamers definition back in the files that define the objects, i.e. merging in a same file the generated code and the hand-written one, is that right ?

[sbinet]

yes.

usually I agree it'd be better to leave automatically generated files and handwritten files separated (for convenience and for git history) but I don't expect the definition of these C++ classes to see much churn at this point in time.

[aphecetche]

Yes, but you also assume that the generated parts won't change much either ;-)
But ok, those are probably reasonable assumptions, so let's merge this.

[sbinet]

Yes, but you also assume that the generated parts won't change much either ;-)

true. the generated parts will probably change to support generic reading/writing for all streamers.
once I finally get to finalize that part :)