-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
test_051_balancedcolumns.rml
225 lines (213 loc) · 8.39 KB
/
test_051_balancedcolumns.rml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no" ?>
<!DOCTYPE document SYSTEM "rml_1_0.dtd">
<document filename="test_051_balancedcolumns.pdf" debug="0" invariant="default" compression="1">
<template pageSize="(595, 842)" leftMargin="72" showBoundary="0">
<pageTemplate id="main">
<pageGraphics>
<setFont name="Helvetica-Bold" size="18"/>
<drawString x="35" y="783">RML Example 51: BalancedColumns</drawString>
<image file="logo_no_bar.png" preserveAspectRatio="1" x="488" y="749" width="72" height="72"/>
<image file="strapline.png" preserveAspectRatio="1" x="35" y="0" width="525" />
</pageGraphics>
<frame id="1" x1="35" y1="45" width="525" height="590" showBoundary="1"/>
</pageTemplate>
</template>
<stylesheet>
<initialize>
<alias id="bt" value="style.BodyText"/>
</initialize>
<paraStyle
name="h1"
parent="style.Normal"
fontName="Times-Bold"
fontSize="18"
leading="22"
spaceAfter="6"
pageBreakBefore="0"
keepWithNext="0"
/>
<paraStyle
name="h2"
parent="style.Normal"
fontName="Times-Bold"
fontSize="16"
leading="18"
spaceAfter="3"
pageBreakBefore="0"
keepWithNext="0"
/>
<paraStyle
name="keepInFrame"
parent="bt"
fontSize="9"
alignment="right"
/>
<paraStyle name="intro" fontName="Helvetica" fontSize="12" leading="12" spaceAfter="12"/>
<!--this style used for a tablerow example later on in document-->
<blockTableStyle id="simple">
<blockValign start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" value="TOP"/>
<blockFont name="Helvetica" size="6" leading="7"/>
<blockBottomPadding length="1"/>
<blockTopPadding length="1"/>
<lineStyle kind="INNERGRID" colorName="gray" start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" thickness="0.25"/>
<lineStyle kind="BOX" colorName="black" start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" thickness="0.25"/>
</blockTableStyle>
<blockTableStyle id="summary" parent="simple">
<blockBackground colorName="cyan"/>
<blockFont name="Helvetica-Bold" size="6" leading="7"/>
</blockTableStyle>
<blockTableStyle id="continuation" parent="simple">
<blockBackground colorName="silver"/>
<blockFont name="Helvetica-Oblique" size="6" leading="7"/>
</blockTableStyle>
</stylesheet>
<story>
<storyPlace x="35" y="660" width="525" height="73" origin="page">
<para style="intro">RML (Report Markup Language) is ReportLab's own language for specifying the appearance of a printed page, which is converted into PDF by the utility rml2pdf.</para>
<hr color="white" thickness="8pt"/>
<para style="intro">These RML samples showcase techniques and features for generating various types of ouput and are distributed within our commercial package as test cases. Each should be self explanatory and stand alone.</para>
<illustration height="3" width="525" align="center">
<fill color= "(0,0.99,0.97,0.0)" />
<rect x="0" y = "-12" width="525" height="3" round="1" fill="1" stroke = "Yes" />
</illustration>
</storyPlace>
<para style="h1">First Try at a balancedColumns</para>
<para>We intend to have some content that suddenly splits into two columns</para>
<para style="bt">Heading</para>
<balancedColumns ncols="2" needed="72" spaceBefore="7" spaceAfter="11"
leftPadding="none" innerPadding="12" rightPadding="none"
topPadding="none" bottomPadding="none"
showBoundary="False">
<para style="bt">
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. <font color="red">Notice</font>, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
</para>
<para style="h1">A Table</para>
<blockTable>
<blockTableStyle id="tablestyle_000">
<blockValign start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" value="TOP"/>
<lineStyle kind="INNERGRID" colorName="black" start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" thickness="0.25"/>
<lineStyle kind="BOX" colorName="black" start="0,0" stop="-1,-1" thickness="0.25"/>
</blockTableStyle>
<tr><td>alignment</td><td>align
alignment</td></tr>
<tr><td>bulletColor</td><td>bulletcolor
bcolor</td></tr>
<tr><td>bulletFontName</td><td>bfont
bulletfontname</td></tr>
<tr><td>bulletFontSize</td><td>bfontsize
bulletfontsize</td></tr>
<tr><td>bulletIndent</td><td>bindent
bulletindent</td></tr>
<tr><td>firstLineIndent</td><td>findent
firstlineindent</td></tr>
<tr><td>fontName</td><td>face
fontname
font</td></tr>
<tr><td>fontSize</td><td>size
fontsize</td></tr>
<tr><td>leading</td><td>leading</td></tr>
<tr><td>leftIndent</td><td>leftindent
lindent</td></tr>
<tr><td>rightIndent</td><td>rightindent
rindent</td></tr>
<tr><td>spaceAfter</td><td>spaceafter
spacea</td></tr>
<tr><td>spaceBefore</td><td>spacebefore
spaceb</td></tr>
<tr><td>textColor</td><td>fg
textcolor
color</td></tr>
</blockTable>
<para style="h1">A Title</para>
<para style="bt">
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. Notice, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar delimits the strong
generative capacity of the theory. For one thing, the fundamental error
of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a
corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the
paired utterance test. A majority of informed linguistic specialists
agree that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to impose an
interpretation on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within
the dominance scope of a complex symbol. It may be, then, that the
speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition appears to correlate rather
closely with the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any
proposed grammar. Analogously, the notion of level of grammaticalness
may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a general convention
regarding the forms of the grammar.
</para>
</balancedColumns>
<para style="bt" textColor="pink">
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. Notice, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
</para>
</story>
</document>