Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update the comment fork without using Pull Requests #31

Open
almost opened this issue Jan 11, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Update the comment fork without using Pull Requests #31

almost opened this issue Jan 11, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@almost
Copy link
Owner

almost commented Jan 11, 2015

See the answer on SO here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/27762278/65130

We're currently doing number 3 but number 1 would be way better and probably much more reliable.
@milessabin
Copy link
Collaborator

Great news ... presumably it also means it's possible to pull a branch from a fork repo without having to add that repo as an additional remote? Is so that's pretty handy :-)

@almost
Copy link
Owner Author

almost commented Jan 11, 2015

Seems like that would be possible. It is undocumented behaviour which is slightly worrying, but hopefully they won't remove it (and we can keep around the code for the other method in case they ever do).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@almost @milessabin