Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] Serve assets from S3 if they exist #120

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chrisroos
Copy link
Contributor

NOTE. We're not intending for this branch to be merged to master. We're going to use it to test the behaviour of redirecting to S3 in integration.


This is a temporary change that will allow us to test redirecting to and
serving assets from S3 on integration.

This commit causes some tests to fail but we're not worrying about that
as we're not expecting this commit to end up in master.

We've tested the change locally and are happy that it results in a
redirect to assets uploaded to S3. Assets not on S3 continue to be
served directly from the filesystem.

@chrisroos chrisroos changed the title TEMP: Serve assets from S3 if they exist [DO NOT MERGE] TEMP: Serve assets from S3 if they exist Aug 9, 2017
@chrisroos chrisroos changed the title [DO NOT MERGE] TEMP: Serve assets from S3 if they exist [DO NOT MERGE] Serve assets from S3 if they exist Aug 9, 2017
This is a temporary change that will allow us to test redirecting to and
serving assets from S3 on integration.

This commit causes some tests to fail but we're not worrying about that
as we're not expecting this commit to end up in master.

We've tested the change locally and are happy that it results in a
redirect to assets uploaded to S3. Assets not on S3 continue to be
served directly from the filesystem.
@chrisroos chrisroos force-pushed the redirect-to-s3-if-asset-has-been-uploaded branch from ecf0e96 to d1b95c5 Compare August 9, 2017 13:40
@floehopper
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to close this because I don't think we need it any more and in any case I'll leave the remote branch in place in case we do need it again.

@floehopper floehopper closed this Aug 18, 2017
@chrisroos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @floehopper. I'm going to delete the branch as we can always recreate the changes based on the diff in this PR if we need to.

@chrisroos chrisroos deleted the redirect-to-s3-if-asset-has-been-uploaded branch August 21, 2017 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants