Support for Flight Order #51
Conversation
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -238,6 +238,10 @@ FlightOfferSearch[] flightOffersSearches = amadeus.shopping.flightOffersSearch.g | |||
| // body can be a String version of your JSON or a JsonObject | |||
| FlightOfferSearch[] flightOffersSearches = amadeus.shopping.flightOffersSearch.post(body); | |||
|
|
|||
| // Flight Order Management | |||
| // The flightOrderID comes from the Flight Create Orders (in test environment it's temporary) | |||
| com.amadeus.resources.FlightOrder order = amadeus.booking.flightOrder("eJzTd9f3NjIJdzUGAAp%2fAiY=").get(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we avoid using fully-qualified name of the class, like in the rest of the examples?
The argument to amadeus.booking.flightOrder() is a flightOrderID - this fact is not very obvious.
| * | ||
| * <pre> | ||
| * com.amadeus.resources.FlightOrder order = amadeus.booking.flightOrder.( | ||
| * "eJzTd9f3NjIJdzUGAAp%2fAiY=").get(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe mention that "eJzTd9f3NjIJdzUGAAp%2fAiY=" is an example?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @ToString | ||
| public class Traveler { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there no existing class for "Traveler" entity?
|
|
||
| @ToString | ||
| public class Name { | ||
| protected Name() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same - Is there a specific reason to override the constructor?
| @ToString | ||
| public class Phone { | ||
|
|
||
| protected Phone() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same - Is there a specific reason to override the constructor?
|
|
||
| @ToString | ||
| public class Document { | ||
| protected Document() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same - Is there a specific reason to override the constructor?
|
|
||
| @ToString | ||
| public class Contact { | ||
| protected Contact() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same - Is there a specific reason to override the constructor?
No description provided.