- Research Paper: Improving Accuracy & Efficiency in Document Handling for Business Processes
- Sample Code (demonstrates extracting values from structured table data stored in spreadsheets)
- Sample Documents (fake order documents stored as scanned pdf documents, spreadsheets, and email messages)
- Presentation (slides created for a 15-minutes presentation of the research content)
- Research (downloaded copies of documents used as references)
- Guidelines (references for LaTeX styling of IEEE documents)
The following gives and overview of a report structure. You can adjust to fit your needs.
- Abstract (0.5 page)
- Introduction (1 page)
- The Problem (1 page )
- Related work (2 pages)
- Your Idea or solution (1 page)
- The Details ( 5 to 8 pages)
- Conclusion and further work (1 page)
LEVEL | DESCRIPTION |
---|---|
(1) Poor | not relevant to the topic |
(2) Marginal | not insightful |
(3) Acceptable | general with details |
(4) Good | summary with some details |
(5) Honors | Summary presented as an abstract with details such as concepts, relevance, applications, etc. |
Poor | Marginal | Acceptable | Good | Honors | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Originality of the work | |||||
Scholarly relevance | |||||
Professional/industrial relevance | |||||
Completeness of the work | |||||
Acknowledgment of the work of others by references | |||||
Organization of the manuscript | |||||
Clarity in writing, tables, graphs and illustrations | |||||
Presentation |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
To what extent does the student’s presentation communicate both the merits of the research project and the research process that the student went through to complete the project? | |||||
To what extent can the student communicate effectively about the project? Can the student provide cogent responses to questions? Can the student defend the research proposal suggestions made? | |||||
To what extent the student has displayed an extensive literature review when conducting the project? |
Total: ??/15