New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue for RFC 39: Change semantics of no-argument `m.Case()` #1021

Closed

wanda-phi opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Labels

Milestone

Member

wanda-phi commented Jan 8, 2024 •

edited

RFC PR: Add RFC for no-argument m.Case() semantic change. rfcs#39
Implementation PR: Implement RFC 39: Change semantics of no-argument m.Case(). #1031
Implementation PR (0.4.1 warning): Implement RFC 39: Warn on Case() and matches() with no patterns. #1036

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

whitequark added the feature label

whitequark added this to the 0.5 milestone

whitequark added backport:v0.4 bug and removed backport:v0.4 labels

whitequark mentioned this issue

Value.matches() should evaluate to 0 and with Case(): should never be active #1003

Closed

Member

whitequark commented Jan 17, 2024

Released v0.4.1: https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/releases/tag/v0.4.1

whitequark closed this as completed

Member

whitequark commented Jan 17, 2024

Thank you for this work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment