New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API Breaking Changes: Method Names #54
Comments
API breaking changes should be noted specifically on the release notes, but otherwise the changes and the underlying interfaces look fine, with the exception that changing the definition of |
Agreed on everything, including that the |
"API breaking changes should be noted specifically on the release notes..." - Yes they should, and yes they will :-) "... the changes and the underlying interfaces look fine, with the exception that changing the definition of get might be confusing." - It absolutely can be seen as confusing. I'm going to do my best in the documentation and release notes to minimize the confusion. "However seeing as we are pre-1.0 there's not a large impetus to care." - These changes will still impact people's existing projects, so these aren't changes we're taking lightly. However, we agreed that we are pre-1.0, and we feel that in the long term these method names should be more clear. |
Has SOME documentation, but can always be improved #70. So I'm closing this. |
The internals are changing a bunch, but how you USE gun stays the same, with the EXCEPTION of some API renaming:
.get
will be renamed to.val
.load
will be renamed to.get
.set
will be renamed to.put
.all
will be introduced.Are the major things, some minor details like
.blank
is being renamed.not
or maybe depreciated.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: