Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove result type extension from testsuite name #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2015

Conversation

dirk-thomas
Copy link
Contributor

Since #27 added the result type extension to make Jenkins happy all the testsuite names had the extra extension in their name. This added an unnecessary level to the hierarchy.

Before: http://ci.ros2.org/job/ros2_batch_ci_linux/621/testReport/ament_clang_format.lint_cmake/
After: http://ci.ros2.org/job/ros2_batch_ci_linux/622/testReport/ament_clang_format/lint_cmake/

@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas added the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Nov 22, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas self-assigned this Nov 22, 2015
@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please review.

@tfoote
Copy link
Member

tfoote commented Nov 23, 2015

+1, it would be nice to reuse this snippet since it's identical in 9 places including several lines before ad after the changes, but they don't have a common dependency related to linting at the moment so it's not worth adding a dependency. But if there's more in the future it might be worth adding somewhere to contain similar common methods. .

dirk-thomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2015
remove result type extension from testsuite name
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit bb45811 into master Nov 23, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Nov 23, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas deleted the remove_second_extension branch November 23, 2015 21:12
kenji-miyake referenced this pull request in kenji-miyake/ament_lint Oct 20, 2021
remove result type extension from testsuite name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants