Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase cpplint timeout #90

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 7, 2017
Merged

Conversation

mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor

cpplint on arm is hitting the 60-second limit for some packages (http://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux-aarch64_release/254/).

This exposes the timeout argument and sets it to 120 by default so that we're safe in the future.

Looking at the time of all linters, this seems to be the only one that needs to be bumped. But I can propagate it to the other linters if we want to have the same set of parameters everywhere.

  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Dec 7, 2017
@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wjwwood FYI

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas added in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Dec 7, 2017
@@ -24,13 +24,15 @@
# :type MAX_LINE_LENGTH: integer
# :param ROOT: override the --root option of cpplint
# :type ROOT: string
# :param TIMEOUT: the test timeout in seconds, default: 60
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The documented default value doesn't match the implementation.

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas merged commit 468e639 into master Dec 7, 2017
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas deleted the increase_cpplint_timeout branch December 7, 2017 20:34
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants