Image.run(...)

[amihaiemil]

Image should have the run option, and return the created Container. This will be the equivalent of the docker run IMAGE command.

[0crat]

Job #127 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @amihaiemil/z

[0crat]

The job #127 assigned to @llorllale/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and thiscom.zerocracy.Par@66a4d225

[0crat]

@llorllale/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

[llorllale]

@0crat wait while I try to understand something...

[0crat]

@0crat wait while I try to understand something... (here)

@llorllale The impediment for #127 was registered successfully by @llorllale/z

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil seems like the JSONs holding the image's metadata don't have a dedicated "name" field. The closest thing I see that we could use is RepoTags, but it's an array. Eg.:

"RepoTags": [
    "example:1.0",
    "example:latest",
    "example:stable"
]

Is the first half of those values always the same?

[amihaiemil]

@llorllale Yes, I also noticed that, but we add the Name ourselves, when pulling the image, see here

Also, the name of the image is in its URI, as the last segment (but better take it from the Json).
And yes, I believe the first part of the tag is always the name of the Image.

Is this what you asked? :D

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil

Well, yes, but there's no guarantee that it'll be constant.

I just tested:

REPOSITORY                       TAG                 IMAGE ID            CREATED             SIZE
alpine                           latest              3fd9065eaf02        5 months ago        4.15MB

C:\> docker tag alpine docker-java-api

REPOSITORY                       TAG                 IMAGE ID            CREATED             SIZE
alpine                           latest              3fd9065eaf02        5 months ago        4.15MB
docker-java-api                  latest              3fd9065eaf02        5 months ago        4.15MB

And resulting inspection for alpine reveals:

        "RepoTags": [
            "alpine:latest",
            "docker-java-api:latest"
        ]

[amihaiemil]

@llorllale I see, but you don't really need that, do you? Since the name is in the Json (we append it manually when pulling the image) and URI anyay. Or you mean something else?

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil as far as I can see, there is no docker run <image> equivalent in the docker api. So I figured this new Image.run() that you're asking for would be a shortcut for Containers.create(image); Container.start();. Or am I wrong?

[amihaiemil]

@llorllale Yes, exactly, and since RtImage has the name of the Image, it can somehow use RtContainers and create and start a container using its name.

RtImage will get the Containers instance from the encapsulated Docker instance -- I also want to implement this: any object of the API should have a method to return its parent Docker instance. So Image.run() would look something like this (pseudocode):

final Container ctn = this.docker.containers.create(this.name);
ctn.start();
return ctn;

Do you like the idea? Maybe you can start by passing the Docker instance to RtImage and have public method docker()?

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil

Maybe you can start by passing the Docker instance to RtImage and have public method docker()?

Sure.

Now back to my original question.

the name of the image is in its URI, as the last segment (but better take it from the Json)

As I've shown, RepoTags is not really reliable, so I believe the better alternative is to take it from the URI. Do you agree?

[amihaiemil]

@llorllale Yes, I think the URI is the safest, go with that.

[llorllale]

@0crat waiting for review/merge of PR #140

[0crat]

@0crat waiting for review/merge of PR #140 (here)

@llorllale Job #127 is already on hold

[amihaiemil]

@0crat boost x6

[0crat]

@0crat boost x6 (here)

@amihaiemil Argument "x6" doesn't match regex \d+x

[amihaiemil]

@0crat boost 6x

[0crat]

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@095c162d-96f5-4418-a96c-3a3627c066c0, thread: pool-1135-thread-1
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy[2063] java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task java.util.concurrent.FutureTask@48f2798a rejected from java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@7e91cbd3[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 2432938]

0.22.6: Issue: #127, Comment: 398654937

[amihaiemil]

@0crat boost 6x

[0crat]

@0crat boost 6x (here)

@amihaiemil Boost 6x was set for #127

[0crat]

Boosting tasks is against our principles, see §15: -10 point(s) just awarded to @amihaiemil/z

[0crat]

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@a0cc108b-284c-417e-b3b4-360e68d85261, thread: AsyncFlush-7
com.zerocracy.farm.sync.SyncProject[77] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to acquire "verbosity/llorllale.xml" in "PMO" in 2min: a3e35cd2a8c4/18s/0/2/true/false by QuartzScheduler_Worker-3

0.22.22: CID: 1720734113, Type: "Close job", Author: "amihaiemil"

[0crat]

The job #127 assigned to @llorllale/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil can this be taken out of scope?

[amihaiemil]

@0crat out

[0crat]

Order was finished: +30 point(s) just awarded to @llorllale/z

[0crat]

@0crat out (here)

@amihaiemil The job #127 is now out of scope