Why don't you try to use Flowable as possible?

[yubaokang]

No description provided.

[amitshekhariitbhu]

No specific reason . I will try to add this

[kongnanlive]

Flowable vs Observer, Which should we use?

[amitshekhariitbhu]

Depends on requirement. Flowable handles back pressure

[nelson1110]

我觉得还是Observable性能更好一些，但是flowable处理back pressure更方便一些

[janjandev]

@nelson1110 你好，你看过源码吗？为什么 Observable 性能比 Flowable 好？请赐教。

[geolo123]

背压性能问题！

…

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Huajian Jiang";<notifications@github.com>; 发送时间: 2017年10月11日(星期三) 晚上8:34 收件人: "amitshekhariitbhu/RxJava2-Android-Samples"<RxJava2-Android-Samples@noreply.github.com>; 抄送: "Subscribed"<subscribed@noreply.github.com>; 主题: Re: [amitshekhariitbhu/RxJava2-Android-Samples] Why don't you try touse Flowable as possible? (#1) @nelson1110 你好，你看过源码吗？为什么 Obserevable 性能比 Flowable 好？请赐教。 — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.