-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ascertainment bias correction SNPs (RADseq data) #59
Comments
I believe it would be better to post this on the raxml google group, as
it is not directly related with the actual software,
Alexis
…On 31.01.19 19:38, Carol-Symbiomics wrote:
hi everyone!
I was curious about the implementation of the ascertainment bias
correction within RAxML-ng.
I found RAxML-ng way more user-friendly than the raxmlHPC. So I decided
to use RAxML-ng to process my RADseq data. I have a phylip matrix (which
I got from the conversion of a vcf file). I was following the tutorial
steps to proceed but after running the "Tree Inference" step I found out
I have too many different tree topologies.
I'm only interested in getting a clustering analysis, just cause I might
have cryptic species within my data set. I've read that the
ascertainment bias correction (recommended when using only variable
sites as is the case of SNPs) is only important if one wants to correct
for the branch length.
At this point, I'm not sure on how to proceed as my tree inference
assessment shows my trees do not converge to a single topology
Reading input trees from file: mltrees
Loaded 21 trees with 323 taxa.
Average absolute RF distance in this tree set: 160.200000
Average relative RF distance in this tree set: 0.250312
Number of unique topologies in this tree set: 20
Any advice will be greatly appreciated
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#59>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA1w-vJReC48kBasG7KSGRrdGxHKD1ziks5vIzgggaJpZM4ac6Bg>.
--
Alexandros (Alexis) Stamatakis
Research Group Leader, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
Full Professor, Dept. of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
www.exelixis-lab.org
|
Answered in RAxML google group: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
hi everyone!
I was curious about the implementation of the ascertainment bias correction within RAxML-ng.
I found RAxML-ng way more user-friendly than the raxmlHPC. So I decided to use RAxML-ng to process my RADseq data. I have a phylip matrix (which I got from the conversion of a vcf file). I was following the tutorial steps to proceed but after running the "Tree Inference" step I found out I have too many different tree topologies.
I'm only interested in getting a clustering analysis, just cause I might have cryptic species within my data set. I've read that the ascertainment bias correction (recommended when using only variable sites as is the case of SNPs) is only important if one wants to correct for the branch length.
At this point, I'm not sure on how to proceed as my tree inference assessment shows my trees do not converge to a single topology
Reading input trees from file: mltrees
Loaded 21 trees with 323 taxa.
Average absolute RF distance in this tree set: 160.200000
Average relative RF distance in this tree set: 0.250312
Number of unique topologies in this tree set: 20
Any advice will be greatly appreciated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: