Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boto now supports Python 3 #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 25, 2014
Merged

Boto now supports Python 3 #2

merged 2 commits into from Nov 25, 2014

Conversation

dirn
Copy link
Contributor

@dirn dirn commented Nov 24, 2014

No description provided.

@dirn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dirn commented Nov 24, 2014

Sorry about that. If you'd like me to squash the commits into one, just let me know.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-9.04%) when pulling 55f67f6 on dirn:patch-1 into 9072ba3 on amol-:master.

amol- added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2014
Boto now supports Python 3
@amol- amol- merged commit b714dae into amol-:master Nov 25, 2014
@amol-
Copy link
Owner

amol- commented Nov 25, 2014

Thanks!

Sadly It looks like it wasn't tested, on Travis the S3 tests were skipped and once merged they are failing.
I'm willing to do a DEPOT release with S3 support on Py3 but I'll have to fix those issues before being able to do so.

@amol-
Copy link
Owner

amol- commented Nov 25, 2014

Looks like the issue is related to boto/boto#2652 as Boto on Py3 currently doesn't support tempfile instances.

@amol-
Copy link
Owner

amol- commented Nov 25, 2014

Updated test suite on eeacc9e to rely on NamedTemporaryFile which is correctly supported by Boto in place of TemporaryFile.

@dirn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dirn commented Nov 25, 2014

Yeah, it looks like Travis omits secure environment variables from tests run for pull requests. I didn't realize that was the case. Glad to see you got it worked out. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants