Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wow #435

Closed
suchow opened this issue Apr 2, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Wow #435

suchow opened this issue Apr 2, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@suchow
Copy link
Member

suchow commented Apr 2, 2016

http://www.serenity-software.com/pages/comparisons.html

@suchow
Copy link
Member Author

suchow commented Apr 3, 2016

I played with this today, running it over Lauren Collin's New Yorker article "Love App". Oh my.

@mpacer
Copy link
Member

mpacer commented Apr 3, 2016

This part is crucial

Writers are pleased when a grammar checker finds mistakes in their work,
and most checkers do that. But what writers don’t know is how often the
checker (1) overlooks common or obvious mistakes, (2) falsely flags correct
expressions as mistakes, and (3) offers, as "corrections," new mistakes.
The
only way to discover that information and answer these three crucial
questions is by direct comparison of their performances.

On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Jordan Suchow notifications@github.com wrote:

I played with this today, running it over Lauren Collin's New Yorker
article "Love App". Oh my.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#435 (comment)

@suchow suchow closed this as completed Apr 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants