Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Spec isn't rendering markdown links or code properly in some sections #5186

Closed
kevinSuttle opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5237
Closed

Docs: Spec isn't rendering markdown links or code properly in some sections #5186

kevinSuttle opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5237

Comments

@kevinSuttle
Copy link

kevinSuttle commented Sep 23, 2016

https://www.ampproject.org/docs/reference/spec.html
vs https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/spec/amp-html-format.md#boilerplate

contain the [AMP boilerplate code ('head > style[amp-boilerplate]' and 'noscript > style[amp-boilerplate]')](amp-boilerplate.md) in their head tag. 🔗

https://www.ampproject.org/docs/reference/spec.html#common-attributes
vs https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/spec/amp-html-format.md#common-attributes

The value for the syntax is a simple domain specific language of the form:
[sourcecode] eventName:targetId[.methodName[(arg1=value, arg2=value)]] [/sourcecode]

@kevinSuttle kevinSuttle changed the title Docs: Boilerplate section of spec isn't rendering markdown properly Docs: Spec isn't rendering markdown links or code properly in some sections Sep 23, 2016
@cramforce cramforce assigned ghost Sep 23, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 26, 2016

cc: @pbakaus

This appears to be an issue where if no language is specified for a codeblock, the grow sdk doesn't render the block as code format. Happens in other docs that I found that I'll fix in this bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants