You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are the UI and a11y WG, however we have varying levels of proficiency in a11y.
This means that even a PR reviewed by the UI and a11y WG might miss checking for a11y.
I want to suggest assigning a111y reviewers on the WG (and adding folks from the wider AMP community who can review a11y) who must LGTM code that affects a11y.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are the UI and a11y WG, however we have varying levels of proficiency in a11y.
This means that even a PR reviewed by the UI and a11y WG might miss checking for a11y.
I want to suggest assigning a111y reviewers on the WG (and adding folks from the wider AMP community who can review a11y) who must LGTM code that affects a11y.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: