Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
239b766
commit d041292
Showing
2 changed files
with
118 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| Management | ||
| ========== | ||
|
|
||
| * Early e-records hires in 2000s have led curators to wash their hands of erecords issues. How to integrate back into existing processes? | ||
| * Do we hire specialized staff? | ||
| * Vendor situation is not good. |
112 changes: 112 additions & 0 deletions
112
2011/design-for-digital-curation/design-for-digital-curation.mdown
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ | ||
| design for digital curation | ||
| =========================== | ||
|
|
||
| * initial discussion | ||
| * computer network | ||
| * private network or public network? | ||
| * sensitivity of donor | ||
| * VPN for access | ||
| * difference from paper? | ||
| * ease of discovery | ||
| * appraisal | ||
| * degree of processing | ||
|
|
||
| * jeremy leighton john presentation | ||
| * digital lives as strategic project | ||
| * public and organizational engagement | ||
| * skills | ||
| * content & access | ||
| * professional interaction | ||
| * . | ||
| * personal digital mss project/eMSS | ||
| * inc. wendy cope; harold pinter | ||
| * initial explorations | ||
| * video walks/interviews | ||
| * panorama photographs | ||
| * landscape/people photography | ||
| * oral history | ||
| * aspects | ||
| * register | ||
| * inventory on receipt/intake | ||
| * eMSS processing | ||
| * fast digitization | ||
| * enhanced curation | ||
| * independent sources | ||
| * community participation | ||
| * adaptive information management | ||
| * digital preservation | ||
| * transfer/ingest | ||
| * advanced access & resource discovery | ||
| * integration | ||
| * guidelines | ||
| * research | ||
| * extraordinary requests - outside entities | ||
| * people, places, contexts, identifiers | ||
| * time & process | ||
| * digital objects curatorial system steps | ||
| * key component | ||
| * digital replicates (export) | ||
| * digital elements (formation (inc expanding compound files)) | ||
| * digital facisimiles | ||
| * digital capture database - prototype filemaker application | ||
| * personal vs curatorial digital objects and media | ||
| * appraisal decision whether to keep original media | ||
| * appropriate scale for recording metadata in this form? | ||
|
|
||
| * paul wheatley presentation - @prwheatley - paul.wheatley@bl.uk | ||
| * digital preservation manager,BL | ||
| * three main areas of digpres work atBL | ||
| * enhance ability to perform digital preservation (collab projects like planets, SCAPE, POCOS) | ||
| * address root causes of digpres issues atBL | ||
| * manage and preserveBL collections | ||
| * key activities | ||
| * digital asset register - ~200 entries; where it is/what it is/who's responsible | ||
| * data stabilization (moving off removable media to secure storage) | ||
| * permanent access activity - risk assessment/content checking | ||
| * SCAPE: EU 3.5 yr project; mostly focused onscale/complexity | ||
| * AQUA | ||
| * QA work is essential; things go wrong | ||
| * content arrives in imperfect condition | ||
| * moving, processing, unpacking, repacking, generating md | ||
| * errors (human/software), full disks, etc | ||
| * solutions | ||
| * checksums/verifiable manifests | ||
| * not always used | ||
| * legacy content doesnt always have them | ||
| * situation improving significant | ||
| * less helpful when content is processed/migrate/dcurated | ||
| * manual QA | ||
| * fallible | ||
| * does not scale | ||
| * costly | ||
| * automating QA (under dev) | ||
| * enable timely checking of content on acquisition | ||
| * verify condition at "change points" | ||
| * check condition following deposit in digital library system | ||
| * analytics during process | ||
| * goes beyond format characterization/validation - TIFF with bitrot can still be a valid TIFF | ||
| * AQuA: automating quality assurance project | ||
| * http://wiki.opf-labs.org/display/AQuA | ||
| * 6 month JIS project between York & Leeds Unis,BL, and OPF | ||
| * apply existing software tools to variety of digpres issues and QA problems | ||
| * 2 3-day mashup/hackathon events | ||
| * collection owners bring content, techies bring scripting/hacking skills - "speed dating" | ||
| * define and articulate preservation issues | ||
| * hack and mash - develop QA solutions | ||
| * wrap-up/evaluate results | ||
| * initial prototypes: | ||
| * fingerprinting techniques to id duplicate/similar files | ||
| * crosschecking content and metadata | ||
| * validation of format migration using OCR comparison | ||
| * deep validation of PDFs re: fonts | ||
| * sven laqua & angela sasse | ||
| * sensemaking UIs for digital archivists | ||
| * focus-metaphor interfaces - know dis | ||
| * motivation: information overload; insufficient search | ||
| * goals: better, different information experience | ||
| * personal, task-centric UI | ||
| * automated, proactive search | ||
| * support for information discovery and exploration | ||
| * focus-metaphor prortype demonstrated lower task completion time and error rate | ||
| * initial search results display -> item view with related items surrounding | ||
| * allows you to specify whether you've viewed things or not |