Fix: Treat VRM0 BlendShapeProxy as EntryPoint #810
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #809 by marking VRM0
BlendShapeProxyas EntryPoint, just likeAnimator.(VRM1 counterpart,
Vrm10Instance, is already EntryPoint.)We should not access
Component.transformhere anyway, because avatar processing is at an intermediate state when FindUnusedObjects is collecting dependencies.Also I have made an assumption that AvatarOptimizer does not change Material names or remap parameter values, except when MergeToonLitMaterial is used.
(I didn't mark these comments as TODOs because I doubt "tracking material changes" would happen in near future.)