Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XE6+FastMM #26

Open
talpa opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

XE6+FastMM #26

talpa opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@talpa
Copy link

talpa commented Apr 18, 2016

Sorry but scaleMM2 is in real application slower than xe6-fastmm

@andremussche
Copy link
Owner

Do you have a testcase?
It is a little bit slower than fastmm in single threaded situations but
scales great in multi threaded scenario's.
Maybe you have a specific situation? If you can profile or reproduce it, I
can take a look at it.

2016-04-18 10:53 GMT+02:00 talpa notifications@github.com:

Sorry but scaleMM2 is in real application slower than xe6-fastmm


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#26

@talpa
Copy link
Author

talpa commented Apr 18, 2016

I tried some query in single thread, And scaleMM2 was about 15% the worse than FastMM ( release 32bit app, Studio RAD XE6). I have AsmProfiler for this test.

@andremussche
Copy link
Owner

What kind of database? And try to do the same with 4 threads :)
Fastmm is fastest with single threaded but slow with multithreaded so only
use when needed

Op 18 apr. 2016 11:43 AM schreef "talpa" notifications@github.com:

I tried some query in single thread, And scaleMM2 was about 15% the worse
than FastMM ( release 32bit app, Studio RAD XE6)


You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#26 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants