Reasoning behind

• I have a specific usage of data window, specifically, my data comes in one at a time, so I am mostly interested in comparing joint usage of the following functionality:

    push_back();
    pop_front();

• I tried to bench against few commonly used containers, seems like there is chance to do slightly better (~5x times for my task ON MY MACHINE).

• Refer to the benchmarking details here: bench

• See usage examples in the tests.cpp file.

• Important thing is that this impl doesn't call a dtor of an element whee popping, therefore it should do less work that other implementations, ie boost::circular_buffer. But it becomes developer's problem to track data reliability.

• Feel free to use at your own risk, no guarantees of any kind are given whatsoever. MIT license, see attached.

Update on 30th of March 2024

• Added pushFront and popBack methods