Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work around basic block creation for switch opcodes #677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 18, 2019

Conversation

reox
Copy link
Member

@reox reox commented Apr 18, 2019

It looks like that some specifications were not fulfilled
like aligned code.
This should work now, and if not there should be a warning.

It looks like that some specifications were not fulfilled
like aligned code.
This should work now, and if not there should be a warning.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #677 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 80%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #677      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.29%   72.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines       16002    16004       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        11569    11570       +1     
- Misses       4433     4434       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
androguard/core/analysis/analysis.py 77.38% <100%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
androguard/core/bytecodes/dvm.py 62.52% <76.92%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 10e0ca2...83de543. Read the comment docs.

@reox reox merged commit 6a62588 into androguard:master Apr 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants