Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the "option" field type for custom fields #71

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 1, 2017

Conversation

antifuchs
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

JIRA supports SelectList field types, which are similar to but
represented not quite the same as Strings. This change allows go-jira
to create issues with custom fields on them that are SelectLists.

Why?

I had to create an issue in a project that heavily templates issues with custom fields, and it's making use of the "SelectList" type a lot. This was the only way I could get it to work on our installation.

I hope you find this PR acceptable - happy to fix anything that's wrong with it (:

JIRA supports SelectList field types, which are similar to but
represented not quite the same as Strings. This change allows go-jira
to create issues with custom fields on them that are SelectLists.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 27, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.4%) to 78.194% when pulling 967e2d4 on antifuchs:add-option-field-type into 320d02c on andygrunwald:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 27, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 78.71% when pulling dda28f9 on antifuchs:add-option-field-type into 320d02c on andygrunwald:master.

@andygrunwald andygrunwald merged commit 792e94b into andygrunwald:master May 1, 2017
@andygrunwald
Copy link
Owner

Thank you :)

@antifuchs antifuchs deleted the add-option-field-type branch May 25, 2019 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants