We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
and I guess regular collections.namedtuple too
collections.namedtuple
should we maybe treat any name in the namespace as a potential type?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fixes: #47 handle more top-level type defs (namedtuple etc)
0b66ffa
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
and I guess regular
collections.namedtuple
tooshould we maybe treat any name in the namespace as a potential type?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: