Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(ivy): move error-handling test to be handled at a later stage #28212

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

matsko
Copy link
Contributor

@matsko matsko commented Jan 17, 2019

Due to the fast moving nature of the Ivy codebase, the timing isn't right to make changes to how errors and reported and handled during the runtime.

Once ivy is stable this test should be revisted because that stage there will be a better and more robust understanding of how ivy should recover from runtime errors.

Jira Issue: FW-952

@matsko matsko requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2019 19:33
@mary-poppins
Copy link

You can preview 4536530 at https://pr28212-4536530.ngbuilds.io/.

@alfaproject
Copy link
Contributor

So you are saying it's not really obsolete and still needs to be tackled at some point, right?

@kara kara added action: cleanup The PR is in need of cleanup, either due to needing a rebase or in response to comments from reviews target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release comp: ivy labels Jan 18, 2019
@ngbot ngbot bot added this to the needsTriage milestone Jan 18, 2019
Due to the fast moving nature of the Ivy codebase, the timing isn't
right to make changes to how errors and reported and handled during the
runtime.

Once ivy is stable this test should be revisted because that stage there
will be a better and more robust understanding of how ivy should recover
from runtime errors.

Jira Issue: FW-952
Copy link
Contributor

@kara kara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kara kara added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed action: cleanup The PR is in need of cleanup, either due to needing a rebase or in response to comments from reviews labels Jan 25, 2019
@jasonaden jasonaden closed this in 7421534 Jan 25, 2019
wKoza pushed a commit to wKoza/angular that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2019
…ngular#28212)

Due to the fast moving nature of the Ivy codebase, the timing isn't
right to make changes to how errors and reported and handled during the
runtime.

Once ivy is stable this test should be revisted because that stage there
will be a better and more robust understanding of how ivy should recover
from runtime errors.

Jira Issue: FW-952

PR Close angular#28212
wKoza pushed a commit to wKoza/angular that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2019
…ngular#28212)

Due to the fast moving nature of the Ivy codebase, the timing isn't
right to make changes to how errors and reported and handled during the
runtime.

Once ivy is stable this test should be revisted because that stage there
will be a better and more robust understanding of how ivy should recover
from runtime errors.

Jira Issue: FW-952

PR Close angular#28212
vetom pushed a commit to vetom/angular that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2019
…ngular#28212)

Due to the fast moving nature of the Ivy codebase, the timing isn't
right to make changes to how errors and reported and handled during the
runtime.

Once ivy is stable this test should be revisted because that stage there
will be a better and more robust understanding of how ivy should recover
from runtime errors.

Jira Issue: FW-952

PR Close angular#28212
@matsko matsko deleted the issue_FW-952 branch February 7, 2019 19:13
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants