New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: fix spelling error in angular component class description #32971
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign. Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with What to do if you already signed the CLAIndividual signers
Corporate signers
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
@googlebot I signed it! |
CLAs look good, thanks! ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be honest, I think this whole sentence doesn't really make sense and that we should just remove the whole thing. What do you think @jbogarthyde ?
@ODAVING thanks for submitting this. Please note that the commit message must follow our required syntax: https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about:
In Angular, you create a component class to contain the data model and control methods. Use the TypeScript export
keyword to export the class so that the functionality can be imported into NgModules.
@petebacondarwin and @jbogarthyde thank you for reviewing this. I'll make the changes asap. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Can you please squash together the two commits?
facb6c7
to
1899328
Compare
Thanks for this, @ODAVING. Could you rebase and then tag me when you're ready? I'd like to help you move this forward. By the way, I have notes on rebasing if you'd find them helpful. Thank you! |
Hm, I think this might be a flake. Or, wait. Did you remember to push up after rebasing? I'm still seeing your branch as being well behind. https://github.com/ODAVING/angular/tree/angular%2332948 |
@kapunahelewong I forced pushed after rebasing it 11 days ago. The ci/circleci: test_aio_local_ivy test keeps failing though. |
@kapunahelewong The only reason according to circleci_ivy that it's failing is the following message: |
Oh, I thought you meant you'd just rebased today. Could you try it? 🙏🏼 Sometimes there are flakes and a new rebase can help clear them up. I don't think it's anything you've done (since it's referring to Ivy). And if you bring it as up-to-date as possible, that should help. Then if it still fails, either that one or another, it's easier for us to get it green for merge since a whole bunch of other updates are in there. Does that help give context? |
@kapunahelewong Done, hoping it works this time 🤞 |
Yay! It worked! But, I only just noticed that there are two commits. Could you squash? Here are my own notes on the workflow. You're so close! :) |
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
0b9d693
to
1899328
Compare
CLAs look good, thanks! ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
When I try to squash, do I have to go through all 260 commits that my branch was behind of, and 'f' them all? @kapunahelewong |
No, you don't need to go through all those. Just
^^That will only give you the option to squash 2 commits. Here's where that command gets me on just some branch I have locally (unrelated to this PR, so disregard the commit messages): Next, I change the second (my more recent commit) to be Then I save and exit. Now if I do a
Now, if I were to push up, that single commit would be the one to show up in my PR. My second looks like it's gone, but its work is still in there. After you've squashed, the rebase will take care of the 260-ish commits. Those should be handled automatically. Does that help? EDIT: Oh! I see you rebased fine! Well done! Tag me when you've squashed. 🌟 |
I’ll try this again, but Last time I did that, I saw all the 260 commit
messages!
Will update asap!
…On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 3:45 PM Kapunahele Wong ***@***.***> wrote:
No, you don't need to go through all those. Just f/fixup the second one.
So, here's the way you want to go through it:
git rebase -i HEAD~2
^^That will only give you the option to squash 2 commits. Here's where
that command get me on just some branch I have locally (unrelated to this
PR, so disregard the commit messages):
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4116963/67237157-b7b51080-f418-11e9-9f42-c29ae2555cc0.png>
Next, I change the second (my more recent commit) to be f:
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4116963/67237213-d4514880-f418-11e9-96c9-55c327826b10.png>
Then I save and exit. Now if I do a git log --oneline, I have only the
one commit:
57e6e7c (HEAD -> my-test-branch) docs: fix animations reference links to api pages
Now, if I were to push up, that single commit would be the one to show up
in my PR. My second looks like it's gone, but its work is still in there.
After you've squashed
<https://gist.github.com/kapunahelewong/567c30f7b353fd1c39bbf6d8343e2dca#how-to-rebase>,
the rebase will take care of the 260-ish commits. Those should be handled
automatically. Does that help?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32971?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFTFEL6UXVE457BV5GOGZHLQPYBEVA5CNFSM4I4Z3P3KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEB3RNHQ#issuecomment-544675486>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTFEL633MJB5RSO4OSILPLQPYBEVANCNFSM4I4Z3P3A>
.
|
46fc6db
to
ba8274d
Compare
change component class section of the docs Closes angular#32948
ba8274d
to
d09f6c4
Compare
Look, @ODAVING! I fixed the extra merge commit! (I've never done that before on someone else's PR). Yay!!!!! Rebased and amended! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @ODAVING!!
Merge assistance: global approval for docs changes. Thank you!
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit
Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information