-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(compiler): Allow extraction for some private symbols, like $… #55340
Closed
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "docs/\u0275$localize"
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to clarify whether we want to hard-code this FW-repo specific logic into
ngtsc/docs
. My understanding is that the docs extraction can be a useful tool for other pipelines as well, in the future.A more future-proof and also code-local solution would be adding special tag information to these exports. e.g.
@forceApiGeneration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or idealy, understand why #55345 doesn't work ?
Having
forceApiGeneration
would still require us to rename the symbol to remove the bared o.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that would also work. In either case, not a big fan of a map in
ngtsc/docs
. The JSDoc could also include the name that it should be renamed to. e.g.@forceApiGeneration $localize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It sounds like we should fix the root cause though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW there are already framework-specific patterns hard-coded into the docs extraction (though not as far as hard-coding specific symbols). If we ever want to open it up to code outside the Angular team, it would be a whole project to deal with this. I do agree, though, that it's better to avoid hard-coding things if we have a reasonable, more general alternative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even aside from hard-coding specifics (while the current ones, as you said, are not symbol specific, except maybe Angular-ecosystem wide lifecycle hooks), keeping these "special behaviors" local to the exported declarations is cleaner and more obvious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that if we can get #55345 to work, that would be better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was finally able to get what I wanted in #55345.